Compare StocksC vs INTC

Citigroup Inc. (C) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, C is undervalued at $143, with a DCF intrinsic value of $419 and a margin of safety of 66%. INTC is overvalued at $134, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. Of the two, C has the wider margin of safety.

C
Citigroup Inc.
$143.06
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99

Rewards

C
  • Citigroup Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.79 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
INTC

    Risks

    C
    • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • Trailing P/E of 17.7x is 50% above the historical average of 11.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    C
    INTC
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    -1.23%
    17.68
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    11.42
    Forward P/E
    86.70
    Quality & Moat
    2.60%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    7.65%
    ROE
    -2.91%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    0.79
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.10
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    1.68%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    C: 5Ties: 1INTC: 1
    CINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    C

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    C
    $5.69
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $20.43B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$116.31B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    C
    65.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 65.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $143.06
    Fair Value: $418.88
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $133.99
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    C

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    C
    83/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    C
    -2.11
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    C
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 81.6%Retail & Other 18.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,188
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,349
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    C
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    C
    3
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $15.83M
    DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM
    Director
    $265,260
    @ $125.30 · 2026-05-08
    GILES NICOLE M.
    Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $131.80 · 2026-04-15
    SKYLER EDWARD
    Officer
    $3.29M
    @ $131.41 · 2026-04-15
    MASON MARK A.L.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $416,045
    @ $114.71 · 2026-02-20
    LUCHETTI GONZALO
    Officer
    $2.30M
    @ $115.03 · 2026-02-12
    HABNER PAMELA
    Officer
    $3.49M
    @ $117.26 · 2026-02-12
    GILES NICOLE M.
    Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $119.04 · 2026-02-11
    GARG SUNIL
    Officer
    $2.13M
    @ $118.49 · 2026-02-11
    HENRY PETER B
    Director
    $271,209
    @ $90.40 · 2025-07-16
    DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM
    Director
    $301,493
    @ $68.26 · 2025-04-30
    SKYLER EDWARD
    Officer
    $2.93M
    @ $82.41 · 2025-02-14
    MASON MARK A.L.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.86M
    @ $83.21 · 2025-02-14
    WECHTER SARA
    Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $81.01 · 2025-02-13
    SELVAKESARI ANAND
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.43M
    @ $81.10 · 2025-02-13
    MCINTOSH BRENT
    Officer
    $1.62M
    @ $81.22 · 2025-02-13
    LUCHETTI GONZALO
    Officer
    $1.33M
    @ $81.36 · 2025-02-13
    KHALIQ SYED SHAHMIR
    Officer
    $2.45M
    @ $81.70 · 2025-02-13
    HENRY PETER B
    Director
    $909,675
    @ $69.97 · 2024-11-11
    LUCHETTI GONZALO
    Officer
    $816,314
    @ $61.59 · 2024-08-20
    OKPARA JOHNBULL
    Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $60.57 · 2024-08-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    C
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(73/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    C
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View C Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: C vs INTC

    Is Citigroup Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, C trades at a 65.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $419 vs. price $143), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Citigroup Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    C scores 83/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Citigroup Inc. in financial distress?

    C's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Citigroup Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    C earns 2.6% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.