Compare Stocks › C vs INTC

Citigroup Inc. (C) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, C is undervalued at $123, with a DCF intrinsic value of $636 and a margin of safety of 81%. INTC is overvalued at $66, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. Of the two, C has the wider margin of safety.

C
Citigroup Inc.
$122.64
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76

Rewards

C
  • ★Citigroup Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.51 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

C
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.20 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
C
INTC
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$670.37M
N/A
FCF Yield
0.19%
11.95
Trailing P/E
N/A
9.37
Forward P/E
35.50
Quality & Moat
2.75%
ROIC
4.06%
9.35%
ROE
-9.62%
0.00%
Gross Margin
40.15%
0.51
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.20
2.19%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
C: 4Ties: 1INTC: 2
CINTC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
C

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
C
$5.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.43B
Δ Market Cap
+$116.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
C
80.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 80.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $122.64
Fair Value: $635.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
C

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
C
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
C
-2.11
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
C
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 83.2%Retail & Other 16.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,412
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
C
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
C
0
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.56M
DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM
Director
$265,260
@ $125.30 · 2026-05-08
GILES NICOLE M.
Officer
$1.68M
@ $131.80 · 2026-04-15
SKYLER EDWARD
Officer
$3.29M
@ $131.41 · 2026-04-15
MASON MARK A.L.
Chief Financial Officer
$416,045
@ $114.71 · 2026-02-20
LUCHETTI GONZALO
Officer
$2.30M
@ $115.03 · 2026-02-12
HABNER PAMELA
Officer
$3.49M
@ $117.26 · 2026-02-12
GILES NICOLE M.
Officer
$2.00M
@ $119.04 · 2026-02-11
GARG SUNIL
Officer
$2.13M
@ $118.49 · 2026-02-11
HENRY PETER B
Director
$271,209
@ $90.40 · 2025-07-16
DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM
Director
$301,493
@ $68.26 · 2025-04-30
SKYLER EDWARD
Officer
$2.93M
@ $82.41 · 2025-02-14
MASON MARK A.L.
Chief Financial Officer
$4.86M
@ $83.21 · 2025-02-14
LUCHETTI GONZALO
Officer
$1.33M
@ $81.36 · 2025-02-13
KHALIQ SYED SHAHMIR
Officer
$2.45M
@ $81.70 · 2025-02-13
WECHTER SARA
Officer
$1.23M
@ $81.01 · 2025-02-13
SELVAKESARI ANAND
Chief Operating Officer
$2.43M
@ $81.10 · 2025-02-13
MCINTOSH BRENT
Officer
$1.62M
@ $81.22 · 2025-02-13
HENRY PETER B
Director
$909,675
@ $69.97 · 2024-11-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
C
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
C
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
View C Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: C vs INTC

Is Citigroup Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, C trades at a 80.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $636 vs. price $123), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Citigroup Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

C scores 83/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Citigroup Inc. in financial distress?▼

C's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Citigroup Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

INTC earns 4.1% ROIC versus C's 2.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

C vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io