Compare Stocks › C vs GOOGL

Citigroup Inc. (C) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, C is undervalued at $123, with a DCF intrinsic value of $636 and a margin of safety of 81%. GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. Of the two, C has the wider margin of safety.

C
Citigroup Inc.
$122.64
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84

Rewards

C
  • ★Citigroup Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.51 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

C
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.20 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GOOGL

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    C
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.16B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    -0.03%
    11.95
    Trailing P/E
    14.61
    9.37
    Forward P/E
    18.49
    Quality & Moat
    2.75%
    ROIC
    14.30%
    9.35%
    ROE
    44.29%
    0.00%
    Gross Margin
    60.86%
    0.51
    PEG Ratio
    0.98
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.62
    2.19%
    Dividend Yield
    0.31%
    C: 4Ties: 1GOOGL: 3
    CGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    C

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    C
    $5.69
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $20.43B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$116.31B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    C
    80.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 80.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $122.64
    Fair Value: $635.94
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    C

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    C
    83/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    C
    -2.11
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    C
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 83.2%Retail & Other 16.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,412
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    C
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    C
    0
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $15.56M
    DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM
    Director
    $265,260
    @ $125.30 · 2026-05-08
    GILES NICOLE M.
    Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $131.80 · 2026-04-15
    SKYLER EDWARD
    Officer
    $3.29M
    @ $131.41 · 2026-04-15
    MASON MARK A.L.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $416,045
    @ $114.71 · 2026-02-20
    LUCHETTI GONZALO
    Officer
    $2.30M
    @ $115.03 · 2026-02-12
    HABNER PAMELA
    Officer
    $3.49M
    @ $117.26 · 2026-02-12
    GILES NICOLE M.
    Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $119.04 · 2026-02-11
    GARG SUNIL
    Officer
    $2.13M
    @ $118.49 · 2026-02-11
    HENRY PETER B
    Director
    $271,209
    @ $90.40 · 2025-07-16
    DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM
    Director
    $301,493
    @ $68.26 · 2025-04-30
    SKYLER EDWARD
    Officer
    $2.93M
    @ $82.41 · 2025-02-14
    MASON MARK A.L.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.86M
    @ $83.21 · 2025-02-14
    LUCHETTI GONZALO
    Officer
    $1.33M
    @ $81.36 · 2025-02-13
    KHALIQ SYED SHAHMIR
    Officer
    $2.45M
    @ $81.70 · 2025-02-13
    WECHTER SARA
    Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $81.01 · 2025-02-13
    SELVAKESARI ANAND
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.43M
    @ $81.10 · 2025-02-13
    MCINTOSH BRENT
    Officer
    $1.62M
    @ $81.22 · 2025-02-13
    HENRY PETER B
    Director
    $909,675
    @ $69.97 · 2024-11-11
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    C
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    C
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    View C Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: C vs GOOGL

    Is Citigroup Inc. or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, C trades at a 80.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $636 vs. price $123), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Citigroup Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while C scores 83/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Citigroup Inc. in financial distress?▼

    C's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Citigroup Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus C's 2.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Citigroup Inc.'s or Alphabet Inc.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to C's 79/100 (Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    C vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io