Compare Stocks › BXP vs GOOGL

BXP, Inc. (BXP) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BXP is overvalued at $63, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. Of the two, BXP has the wider margin of safety.

BXP
BXP, Inc.
$62.80
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84

Rewards

BXP
  • ★Trailing P/E of 18.8x is 92% below the historical average of 233.8x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

BXP
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.33 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠High leverage (2.03x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 8.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
GOOGL

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BXP
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.16B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    -0.03%
    18.80
    Trailing P/E
    14.61
    30.11
    Forward P/E
    18.49
    Quality & Moat
    3.51%
    ROIC
    14.30%
    8.96%
    ROE
    44.29%
    59.24%
    Gross Margin
    60.86%
    2.33
    PEG Ratio
    0.98
    Balance Sheet Safety
    2.03
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    8.55
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.62
    4.46%
    Dividend Yield
    0.31%
    BXP: 1Ties: 2GOOGL: 7
    BXPGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BXP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BXP
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-1.54B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$105.1M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BXP
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $62.80
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BXP

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BXP
    56/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BXP
    -2.79
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BXP
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 113.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders818
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BXP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BXP
    0
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.66M
    LABELLE MICHAEL E.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $66.35 · 2026-06-09
    KEVORKIAN ERIC G
    Officer
    $131,747
    @ $59.88 · 2026-05-22
    OTTENI PETER V
    Officer
    $287,186
    @ $59.06 · 2026-05-20
    SPANN HILARY J.
    Officer
    $327,997
    @ $59.69 · 2026-02-27
    SPANN HILARY J.
    Officer
    $75,592
    @ $63.31 · 2026-02-05
    RITCHEY RAYMOND A
    Officer
    $2.62M
    @ $72.18 · 2025-12-01
    OTTENI PETER V
    Officer
    $300,470
    @ $72.65 · 2025-11-25
    STROMAN JOHN J
    Officer
    $1.22M
    @ $72.17 · 2025-11-12
    LABELLE MICHAEL E.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $970,952
    @ $72.34 · 2025-11-07
    GARESCHE DONNA D
    Officer
    $145,453
    @ $67.87 · 2025-03-05
    SPANN HILARY J.
    Officer
    $891,536
    @ $72.02 · 2025-02-04
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BXP
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BXP
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    View BXP Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BXP vs GOOGL

    Is BXP, Inc. or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BXP trades at a -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $0 vs. price $63), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, BXP, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while BXP scores 56/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is BXP, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    BXP's Altman Z-Score of 0.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, BXP, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus BXP's 3.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, BXP, Inc.'s or Alphabet Inc.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to BXP's 45/100 (Borderline). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    BXP vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io