Compare Stocks › BSX vs GOOGL

Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BSX is overvalued at $42, with a DCF intrinsic value of $25 and a margin of safety of -69%. GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. Of the two, BSX has the wider margin of safety.

BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation
$41.98
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84

Rewards

BSX
  • ★Gross margin of 68.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 55.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.37 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BSX
GOOGL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-1.16B
N/A
FCF Yield
-0.03%
17.71
Trailing P/E
14.61
13.28
Forward P/E
18.49
Quality & Moat
8.91%
ROIC
14.30%
14.32%
ROE
44.29%
68.58%
Gross Margin
60.86%
0.62
PEG Ratio
0.98
Balance Sheet Safety
0.48
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.12
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.62
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.31%
BSX: 3Ties: 1GOOGL: 6
BSXGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BSX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BSX
$11.89
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.32B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.08B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BSX
69.4% Overvalued
Price is 69.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $41.98
Fair Value: $24.79
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
3447.8% Overvalued
Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $279.84
Fair Value: $7.89
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BSX

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

GOOGL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BSX
66/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BSX
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BSX
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 95.0%Retail & Other 4.8%
No. of Institutional Holders2,218
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,451
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BSX
3
Buys (3M)
8
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.04M
MORANO SUSAN E.
Director
$100,408
@ $49.22 · 2026-08-25
HABIGER DAVID C
Director
$99,937
@ $47.59 · 2026-08-05
HABIGER DAVID C
Director
$56,887
@ $48.13 · 2026-08-04
MAHONEY MICHAEL F
Chief Executive Officer
$9.00M
@ $48.33 · 2026-08-03
LUDWIG EDWARD J.
Director
$227,400
@ $45.48 · 2026-07-31
LUDWIG EDWARD J.
Director
$202,914
@ $56.68 · 2026-05-20
HABIGER DAVID C
Director
$251,098
@ $56.43 · 2026-05-20
PEGUS CHERYL
Director
$99,987
@ $56.49 · 2026-05-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BSX
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $23.04M
MAHONEY MICHAEL F
Chief Executive Officer
$15.04M
@ $93.49 · 2026-02-02
BUTCHER ARTHUR C
Officer
$1.76M
@ $101.55 · 2025-12-01
ZANE ELLEN M
Director
$1.27M
@ $98.28 · 2025-11-06
FITZGERALD JOSEPH MICHAEL
Officer
$4.97M
@ $99.47 · 2025-11-03
ZANE ELLEN M
Director
$1.31M
@ $101.38 · 2025-10-28
FITZGERALD JOSEPH MICHAEL
Officer
$4.92M
@ $98.47 · 2025-10-01
FITZGERALD JOSEPH MICHAEL
Officer
$5.27M
@ $105.43 · 2025-09-02
BUTCHER ARTHUR C
Officer
$1.81M
@ $104.63 · 2025-08-01
FITZGERALD JOSEPH MICHAEL
Officer
$5.23M
@ $104.63 · 2025-08-01
FUJIMORI YOSHIAKI
Director
$310,378
@ $106.99 · 2025-07-29
LUDWIG EDWARD J.
Director
$424,120
@ $106.03 · 2025-07-25
FITZGERALD JOSEPH MICHAEL
Officer
$5.35M
@ $106.97 · 2025-07-01
FITZGERALD JOSEPH MICHAEL
President
$5.80M
@ $102.88 · 2025-06-04
MAHONEY MICHAEL F
Chief Executive Officer
$17.05M
@ $103.69 · 2025-06-02
LUDWIG EDWARD J.
Director
$418,368
@ $104.59 · 2025-05-29
BROWN VANCE R
General Counsel
$513,583
@ $106.42 · 2025-05-21
SORENSON JOHN BRADLEY
Officer
$477,957
@ $104.54 · 2025-05-05
BUTCHER ARTHUR C
Officer
$1.77M
@ $102.06 · 2025-05-01
MAHONEY MICHAEL F
Chief Executive Officer
$16.85M
@ $102.48 · 2025-05-01
BROWN VANCE R
General Counsel
$458,904
@ $95.09 · 2025-04-21
MAHONEY MICHAEL F
Chief Executive Officer
$16.45M
@ $100.01 · 2025-04-01
BROWN VANCE R
General Counsel
$486,702
@ $100.85 · 2025-03-21
WOODWORTH EMILY
General Counsel
$800,897
@ $104.95 · 2025-03-04
WOODWORTH EMILY
Officer
$999,872
@ $101.13 · 2025-02-28
MIRVISS JEFFREY B
Officer
$766,921
@ $104.16 · 2025-02-25
ZANE ELLEN M
Director
$1.42M
@ $104.23 · 2025-02-24
BROWN VANCE R
General Counsel
$504,993
@ $104.64 · 2025-02-21
SORENSON JOHN BRADLEY
Officer
$624,861
@ $104.84 · 2025-02-19
MIRVISS JEFFREY B
Officer
$159,078
@ $105.35 · 2025-02-19
BRENNAN DANIEL J
Chief Financial Officer
$8.92M
@ $105.10 · 2025-02-19
SORENSON JOHN BRADLEY
Officer
$127,678
@ $106.31 · 2025-02-14
SORENSON JOHN BRADLEY
Officer
$671,249
@ $105.06 · 2025-02-12
MIRVISS JEFFREY B
Officer
$1.37M
@ $105.06 · 2025-02-12
BRENNAN DANIEL J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.59M
@ $105.07 · 2025-02-12
LUDWIG EDWARD J.
Director
$1.27M
@ $105.48 · 2025-02-11
SORENSON JOHN BRADLEY
Officer
$685,244
@ $104.97 · 2025-02-07
BUTCHER ARTHUR C
Officer
$1.76M
@ $101.80 · 2025-02-03
SORENSON JOHN BRADLEY
Officer
$581,241
@ $89.96 · 2025-01-03
MIRVISS JEFFREY B
Officer
$642,658
@ $89.86 · 2025-01-03
BRENNAN DANIEL J
Chief Financial Officer
$870,636
@ $89.86 · 2025-01-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BSX
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😨Fear(23/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BSX
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
GOOGL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
View BSX Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BSX vs GOOGL

Is Boston Scientific Corporation or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BSX trades at a -69.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $25 vs. price $42), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Boston Scientific Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while BSX scores 66/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BSX scores 5.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Boston Scientific Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus BSX's 8.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

BSX vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io