Compare StocksBRK-B vs ZBRA

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$481.48
VS
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
$206.19

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.66 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
ZBRA
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 26.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 25.2x is 30% below the historical average of 35.9x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BRK-B
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc. scores only 16/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.5x is 75% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
ZBRA
  • FCF yield of 6.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
ZBRA
Valuation
$36.80B
Free Cash Flow
$658.50M
3.54%
FCF Yield
6.30%
15.50
Trailing P/E
25.18
22.11
Forward P/E
10.22
Quality & Moat
11.31%
ROIC
10.21%
9.30%
ROE
11.68%
26.15%
Gross Margin
48.05%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Debt / Equity
0.75
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.61
N/A
Dividend Yield
N/A
BRK-B: 5Ties: 1ZBRA: 4
BRK-BZBRA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

ZBRA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ZBRA
$-0.93
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.24B
Δ Market Cap
$-1.15B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $481.48
Fair Value: $699.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ZBRA
13.2% Overvalued
Price is 13.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $206.19
Fair Value: $182.11
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $481?

+0.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.8%

The market implies +0.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

ZBRA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $206?

+13.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.5%

The market implies +13.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
16/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
ZBRA
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ZBRA
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.5%
No. of Institutional Holders5,852
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ZBRA
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 98.5%Retail & Other 0.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,053
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ZBRA
2
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $386,823
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Director
$41,080
@ $205.40 · 2026-03-12
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Director
$112,625
@ $225.25 · 2026-02-27
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Director
$233,118
@ $233.12 · 2025-11-18
GUSTAFSSON PER ANDERS
Director
$1.00M
@ $309.96 · 2025-02-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ZBRA
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $392,700
ARMSTRONG ROBERT JOHN JR
Officer
$2,068
@ $229.78 · 2026-03-05
KOGL CRISTEN L
Officer
$34,178
@ $235.71 · 2026-03-05
CONNLY LINDA
Director
$356,454
@ $322.00 · 2025-08-12
O SULLIVAN COLLEEN M
Officer
$75,979
@ $399.89 · 2024-11-25
CHO MICHAEL
Officer
$119,483
@ $400.95 · 2024-11-12
WHITE JOSEPH RAMSEY
Officer
$623,567
@ $400.75 · 2024-11-08
HUDSON RICHARD EDWARD
Officer
$435,889
@ $394.47 · 2024-11-07
SCHMITZ JEFFREY F
Officer
$266,098
@ $387.33 · 2024-11-06
KOGL CRISTEN L
Officer
$203,580
@ $390.00 · 2024-11-06
ARMSTRONG ROBERT JOHN JR
Officer
$359,317
@ $393.13 · 2024-11-06
WINTERS NATHAN ANDREW
Chief Financial Officer
$701,241
@ $381.73 · 2024-10-31
SCHMITZ JEFFREY F
Officer
$341,690
@ $341.69 · 2024-08-15
CHO MICHAEL
Officer
$531,087
@ $320.51 · 2024-05-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ZBRA
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
ZBRA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView ZBRA Full Analysis
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io