Compare StocksBRK-B vs ZBRA

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. ZBRA is fairly valued at $236, with an intrinsic value of $237 and a margin of safety of 0%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
$235.98

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
ZBRA
  • Zebra Technologies Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 26.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 28.5x is 21% below the historical average of 35.9x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
ZBRA
  • ROIC has declined by 6.6 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • FCF yield of 7.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
ZBRA
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$831.00M
5.80%
FCF Yield
7.39%
14.56
Trailing P/E
28.47
22.79
Forward P/E
11.40
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
10.46%
10.50%
ROE
11.78%
27.78%
Gross Margin
48.18%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.51
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.79
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.67
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BRK-B: 4Ties: 1ZBRA: 7
BRK-BZBRA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ZBRA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ZBRA
$-0.93
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.24B
Δ Market Cap
$-1.15B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ZBRA
0.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 0.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $235.98
Fair Value: $236.81
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

ZBRA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $236?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.3%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ZBRA
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ZBRA
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ZBRA
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 103.4%
No. of Institutional Holders971
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ZBRA
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $386,823
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Director
$41,080
@ $205.40 · 2026-03-12
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Director
$112,625
@ $225.25 · 2026-02-27
DHANASEKARAN SATISH
Director
$233,118
@ $233.12 · 2025-11-18
GUSTAFSSON PER ANDERS
Director
$1.00M
@ $309.96 · 2025-02-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ZBRA
1
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.14M
ROBERTS JANICE M
Director
$748,620
@ $249.54 · 2026-05-14
KOGL CRISTEN L
Officer
$34,178
@ $235.71 · 2026-03-05
ARMSTRONG ROBERT JOHN JR
Officer
$2,068
@ $229.78 · 2026-03-05
CONNLY LINDA
Director
$356,454
@ $322.00 · 2025-08-12
O SULLIVAN COLLEEN M
Officer
$75,979
@ $399.89 · 2024-11-25
CHO MICHAEL
Officer
$119,483
@ $400.95 · 2024-11-12
WHITE JOSEPH RAMSEY
Officer
$623,567
@ $400.75 · 2024-11-08
HUDSON RICHARD EDWARD
Officer
$435,889
@ $394.47 · 2024-11-07
SCHMITZ JEFFREY F
Officer
$266,098
@ $387.33 · 2024-11-06
KOGL CRISTEN L
Officer
$203,580
@ $390.00 · 2024-11-06
ARMSTRONG ROBERT JOHN JR
Officer
$359,317
@ $393.13 · 2024-11-06
WINTERS NATHAN ANDREW
Chief Financial Officer
$701,241
@ $381.73 · 2024-10-31
SCHMITZ JEFFREY F
Officer
$341,690
@ $341.69 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ZBRA
FearGreed
😨Fear(30/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
ZBRA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView ZBRA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs ZBRA

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Zebra Technologies Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to ZBRA's 0.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $237 vs. $236).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Zebra Technologies Corporation?

ZBRA scores 74/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ZBRA scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Zebra Technologies Corporation?

Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) generates a 7.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s 5.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Zebra Technologies Corporation?

ZBRA earns 10.5% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.