SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs UHS

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$473.01
VS
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$167.00

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.13 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
UHS
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 46.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 14% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.83 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BRK-B
  • ⚠FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 72% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
UHS
  • ⚠FCF yield of 6.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
UHS
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$650.62M
6.00%
FCF Yield
6.38%
15.24
Trailing P/E
6.97
21.95
Forward P/E
6.57
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
12.33%
9.18%
ROE
19.58%
27.78%
Gross Margin
44.23%
0.13
PEG Ratio
0.39
Balance Sheet Safety
0.18
Debt / Equity
0.67
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.88
N/A
Dividend Yield
0.48%
BRK-B: 4Ties: 1UHS: 6
BRK-BUHS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

UHS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UHS
$1.05
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.36B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $473.01
Fair Value: $685.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UHS
65.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 65.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $167.00
Fair Value: $484.06
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $473?

-0.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.0%

The market implies -0.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

UHS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $167?

-1.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies -1.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
UHS
66/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UHS
-2.44
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.6%
No. of Institutional Holders5,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UHS
Insiders 5.5%Institutions 97.2%
No. of Institutional Holders926
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UHS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UHS
1
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.41M
SUSSMAN ELLIOT J
Director
$128,099
@ $190.06 · 2026-03-13
NIMETZ WARREN J.
Director
$852,343
@ $223.30 · 2025-11-11
SUSSMAN ELLIOT J
Director
$217,799
@ $225.70 · 2025-10-29
SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
Director
$210,053
@ $191.48 · 2025-05-14
SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
Director
$179,161
@ $179.16 · 2025-03-10
SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
Director
$308,516
@ $191.15 · 2024-12-11
SUSSMAN ELLIOT J
Director
$375,534
@ $218.08 · 2024-08-13
NIMETZ WARREN J.
Director
$749,552
@ $217.64 · 2024-08-12
CHEN-LANGENMAYR NINA
Director
$180,294
@ $212.11 · 2024-08-07
MCDONNELL EILEEN C.
Director
$531,211
@ $209.55 · 2024-07-26
PETERSON MATTHEW JAY
Officer
$3.19M
@ $210.85 · 2024-07-26
SUSSMAN ELLIOT J
Director
$533,616
@ $210.00 · 2024-07-26
NIMETZ WARREN J.
Director
$130,732
@ $180.32 · 2024-05-16
SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
Director
$302,827
@ $179.29 · 2024-05-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UHS
FearGreed
😨Fear(28/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
UHS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (28)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView UHS Full Analysis
BRK-B vs UHS: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io