SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs TPR

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Tapestry, Inc. (TPR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. TPR is overvalued at $144, with an intrinsic value of $23 and a margin of safety of -534%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
$143.50

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
TPR
  • ★Gross margin of 76.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Tapestry, Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 12.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
TPR
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠High leverage (4.18x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $6.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
TPR
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$1.53B
5.80%
FCF Yield
5.28%
14.56
Trailing P/E
43.62
22.79
Forward P/E
18.54
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
30.19%
10.50%
ROE
60.91%
27.78%
Gross Margin
76.18%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.31
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
4.18
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.45
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.06%
BRK-B: 5Ties: 1TPR: 6
BRK-BTPR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TPR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TPR
$16.88
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.03B
Δ Market Cap
+$17.40B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TPR
534.3% Overvalued
Price is 534.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $143.50
Fair Value: $22.62
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

TPR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $144?

+31.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.3%

The market implies +31.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TPR
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TPR
-3.01
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TPR
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 98.0%Retail & Other 1.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,492
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TPR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TPR
2
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $46.08M
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$2.74M
@ $140.02 · 2026-05-26
CREVOISERAT JOANNE C
Chief Executive Officer
$3.69M
@ $132.89 · 2026-05-13
DADLANI MANESH
Officer
$152,149
@ $156.05 · 2026-03-03
CREVOISERAT JOANNE C
Chief Executive Officer
$7.56M
@ $154.87 · 2026-02-18
GRECO THOMAS R
Director
$2.20M
@ $154.44 · 2026-02-17
DADLANI MANESH
Officer
$329,492
@ $153.47 · 2026-02-11
ROE SCOTT A
Chief Operating Officer
$6.76M
@ $152.62 · 2026-02-10
GATES ANNE
Director
$999,327
@ $153.79 · 2026-02-10
KULIKOWSKY DENISE
Officer
$1.43M
@ $155.62 · 2026-02-10
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$6.03M
@ $151.34 · 2026-02-09
KULIKOWSKY DENISE
Officer
$67,144
@ $115.17 · 2025-12-04
KULIKOWSKY DENISE
Officer
$184,133
@ $110.19 · 2025-11-26
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$1.11M
@ $107.00 · 2025-11-24
ROE SCOTT A
Chief Operating Officer
$1.97M
@ $104.85 · 2025-11-21
CREVOISERAT JOANNE C
Chief Executive Officer
$3.34M
@ $105.31 · 2025-11-21
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$2.98M
@ $102.83 · 2025-11-18
HOWARD DAVID E
Officer
$2.57M
@ $102.50 · 2025-11-18
LAU KA MING ALAN
Director
$1.20M
@ $106.19 · 2025-09-11
DADLANI MANESH
Officer
$780,712
@ $99.05 · 2025-08-25
DADLANI MANESH
Officer
$137,260
@ $82.29 · 2025-05-13
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$3.26M
@ $81.40 · 2025-05-12
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $84.71 · 2025-02-26
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$681,976
@ $87.59 · 2025-02-21
ROE SCOTT A
Chief Operating Officer
$2.23M
@ $86.56 · 2025-02-20
HOWARD DAVID E
General Counsel
$1.05M
@ $88.00 · 2025-02-20
KAHN TODD LEONARD
Officer
$4.19M
@ $58.68 · 2024-11-25
HOWARD DAVID E
General Counsel
$2.48M
@ $58.95 · 2024-11-22
DADLANI MANESH
Officer
$514,219
@ $57.96 · 2024-11-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TPR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
TPR
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView TPR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs TPR

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Tapestry, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to TPR's -534.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $23 vs. $144).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Tapestry, Inc.?▼

TPR scores 82/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?▼

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TPR scores 4.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Tapestry, Inc.?▼

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 5.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Tapestry, Inc.'s 5.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Tapestry, Inc.?▼

TPR earns 30.2% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.