SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs TGT

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Target Corporation (TGT)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$468.52
VS
TGT
Target Corporation
$127.76

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.13 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
TGT
  • ★Target Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Target Corporation scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

BRK-B
  • ⚠FCF yield of 6.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 15.1x is 70% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
TGT
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.44 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
TGT
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$2.59B
6.06%
FCF Yield
4.46%
15.10
Trailing P/E
15.71
21.74
Forward P/E
15.02
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
11.15%
9.18%
ROE
22.92%
27.78%
Gross Margin
27.93%
0.13
PEG Ratio
2.44
Balance Sheet Safety
0.18
Debt / Equity
1.26
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.83
N/A
Dividend Yield
3.54%
BRK-B: 5Ties: 3TGT: 3
BRK-BTGT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

TGT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TGT
$-1.32
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$5.82B
Δ Market Cap
$-7.71B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $468.52
Fair Value: $685.42
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TGT
0.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 0.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $127.76
Fair Value: $128.48
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $469?

-0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.8%

The market implies -0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +0.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

TGT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $128?

+7.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.3%

The market implies +7.5% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +12.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
TGT
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TGT
-2.33
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.6%
No. of Institutional Holders5,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TGT
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 86.3%Retail & Other 13.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,284
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TGT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TGT
2
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $687,431
LIEGEL MATTHEW A
Officer
$240,593
@ $117.19 · 2026-03-17
LIEGEL MATTHEW A
Officer
$240,593
@ $117.19 · 2026-03-17
LIEGEL MATTHEW A
Officer
$206,245
@ $100.90 · 2025-06-10
LIEGEL MATTHEW A
Officer
$32,580
@ $113.52 · 2025-03-07
GOMEZ RICHARD H
Officer
$997,715
@ $157.17 · 2024-09-27
LIEGEL MATTHEW A
Officer
$153,130
@ $153.13 · 2024-08-30
LIU DON H
Officer
$1.00M
@ $160.00 · 2024-08-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TGT
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
TGT
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView TGT Full Analysis
BRK-B vs TGT: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io