Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs TFC

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Truist Financial Corporation (TFC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BRK-B is fairly valued at $542, with a DCF intrinsic value of $590 and a margin of safety of 8%. TFC is undervalued at $49, with an intrinsic value of $76 and a margin of safety of 36%. Of the two, TFC has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$542.49
VS
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
$48.79

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -1.8x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
TFC

    Risks

    BRK-B
    • ⚠FCF yield of 6.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    TFC
    • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠Truist Financial Corporation scores only 10/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.18 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    TFC
    Valuation
    $71.98B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    6.20%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    13.64
    Trailing P/E
    12.57
    24.18
    Forward P/E
    9.93
    Quality & Moat
    11.26%
    ROIC
    5.23%
    12.12%
    ROE
    8.16%
    30.33%
    Gross Margin
    0.00%
    10.06
    PEG Ratio
    1.10
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -1.81
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    N/A
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    4.26%
    BRK-B: 3Ties: 1TFC: 4
    BRK-BTFC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BRK-B

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TFC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    $1.64
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $252.19B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$414.76B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TFC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-228.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$5.03B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    8.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 8.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $542.49
    Fair Value: $589.58
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TFC
    35.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 35.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $48.79
    Fair Value: $75.93
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BRK-B

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $542?

    +2.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +1.6%

    The market implies +2.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    TFC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    40/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TFC
    10/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    -2.41
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TFC
    -2.41
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.0%Retail & Other 32.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,930
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TFC
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 86.4%Retail & Other 13.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,128
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    1
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $500,617
    O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
    General Counsel
    $250,072
    @ $512.44 · 2026-08-12
    O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
    General Counsel
    $250,545
    @ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TFC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.21M
    LYONS MICHAEL P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $48.36 · 2026-10-28
    ROGERS WILLIAM H JR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.66M
    @ $48.56 · 2024-11-25
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TFC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.97M
    WILSON DONTA L
    Officer
    $688,618
    @ $51.85 · 2026-07-31
    BOYER K DAVID JR
    Director
    $202,090
    @ $50.70 · 2026-07-23
    POWELL CYNTHIA B
    Officer
    $183,715
    @ $52.49 · 2026-02-02
    MAGUIRE MICHAEL BARON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $651,664
    @ $50.13 · 2026-01-26
    BOYER K DAVID JR
    Director
    $239,682
    @ $46.45 · 2025-11-25
    BENDER BRADLEY D
    Officer
    $566,689
    @ $45.19 · 2025-07-22
    BOYER K DAVID JR
    Director
    $229,444
    @ $46.20 · 2024-12-04
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TFC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    TFC
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    View BRK-B Full AnalysisView TFC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs TFC

    Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Truist Financial Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TFC trades at a 35.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $76 vs. price $49), compared to BRK-B's 8.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $590 vs. $542).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Truist Financial Corporation?▼

    BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat), while TFC scores 10/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Truist Financial Corporation in financial distress?▼

    TFC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Truist Financial Corporation?▼

    BRK-B earns 11.3% ROIC versus TFC's 5.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    BRK-B vs TFC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io