Compare StocksBRK-B vs TER

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Teradyne, Inc. (TER): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BRK-B is fairly valued at $510, with a DCF intrinsic value of $590 and a margin of safety of 14%. TER is overvalued at $358, with an intrinsic value of $243 and a margin of safety of -48%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$509.99
VS
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
$358.36

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -1.8x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
TER
  • Teradyne, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Teradyne, Inc. scores 72/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.60 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 6.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
TER
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 0.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 49.3x is 32% above the historical average of 37.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
TER
Valuation
$71.98B
Free Cash Flow
$437.38M
6.59%
FCF Yield
0.78%
12.83
Trailing P/E
49.29
22.98
Forward P/E
30.75
Quality & Moat
11.26%
ROIC
32.73%
12.12%
ROE
36.46%
30.33%
Gross Margin
59.24%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.60
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.81
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.17
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.15%
BRK-B: 6Ties: 1TER: 5
BRK-BTER

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TER

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.64
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$414.76B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TER
$12.54
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.32B
Δ Market Cap
+$16.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
13.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 13.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $509.99
Fair Value: $589.58
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TER
46.1% Overvalued
Price is 46.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $358.36
Fair Value: $245.21
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $510?

+1.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.5%

The market implies +1.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +0.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

TER

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $358?

+30.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +33.4%

The market implies +30.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +33.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TER
72/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TER
-2.76
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.9%Retail & Other 32.8%
No. of Institutional Holders5,947
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TER
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 100.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,938
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $500,617
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,072
@ $512.44 · 2026-08-12
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TER
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TER
9
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $14.31M
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$270,264
@ $337.83 · 2026-09-15
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.35M
@ $337.83 · 2026-09-15
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$56,997
@ $341.30 · 2026-09-01
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$510,000
@ $425.00 · 2026-08-17
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.70M
@ $425.00 · 2026-08-17
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$59,453
@ $358.15 · 2026-08-03
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$427,572
@ $356.31 · 2026-07-15
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $356.31 · 2026-07-15
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$76,820
@ $460.00 · 2026-07-01
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$507,636
@ $423.03 · 2026-06-15
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.69M
@ $423.03 · 2026-06-15
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$61,747
@ $369.74 · 2026-06-02
POULIN SHANNON JOHN
Officer
$581,013
@ $349.17 · 2026-05-22
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$140,000
@ $350.00 · 2026-05-21
MATZ MARILYN
Director
$271,184
@ $338.98 · 2026-05-15
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.91M
@ $338.98 · 2026-05-15
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$256,768
@ $377.60 · 2026-05-07
MILLS REGAN
Officer
$5,475
@ $342.19 · 2026-04-08
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$195,125
@ $312.20 · 2026-04-06
MILLS REGAN
Officer
$73,302
@ $290.88 · 2026-04-02
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$187,000
@ $299.20 · 2026-03-05
MILLS REGAN
Officer
$262,302
@ $332.87 · 2026-02-25
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$166,862
@ $266.98 · 2026-02-05
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$132,406
@ $211.85 · 2026-01-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$223,051
@ $201.31 · 2025-12-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$125,000
@ $200.00 · 2025-12-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$199,662
@ $180.20 · 2025-11-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$110,656
@ $177.05 · 2025-11-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$160,926
@ $145.24 · 2025-10-10
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$92,438
@ $147.90 · 2025-10-06
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$70,020
@ $126.39 · 2025-09-22
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$63,710
@ $115.00 · 2025-09-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$75,038
@ $120.06 · 2025-09-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$58,724
@ $106.00 · 2025-08-12
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$66,250
@ $106.00 · 2025-08-05
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$58,574
@ $105.73 · 2025-07-30
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$198,244
@ $105.73 · 2025-07-30
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$69,350
@ $110.96 · 2025-03-03
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$24,082
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$154,302
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$49,613
@ $111.49 · 2025-02-04
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$70,362
@ $112.58 · 2025-02-03
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$62,628
@ $102.00 · 2025-01-30
DRISCOLL RYAN E
Officer
$44,574
@ $102.00 · 2025-01-30
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$656,040
@ $122.90 · 2025-01-29
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$9,340
@ $122.89 · 2025-01-29
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$181,523
@ $122.90 · 2025-01-29
MEHTA SANJAY
Chief Financial Officer
$215,592
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
DRISCOLL RYAN E
General Counsel
$12,895
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$49,048
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$49,048
@ $120.51 · 2025-01-28
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$400,400
@ $130.00 · 2025-01-03
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$79,225
@ $126.76 · 2025-01-02
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$400,400
@ $130.00 · 2024-12-16
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$68,775
@ $110.04 · 2024-12-02
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$69,638
@ $111.42 · 2024-11-07
BURNS RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$129,548
@ $132.19 · 2024-10-02
SMITH GREGORY STEPHEN
Chief Executive Officer
$409,024
@ $132.80 · 2024-10-01
JOHNSON MERCEDES
Director
$83,000
@ $132.80 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TER
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
TER
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView TER Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs TER

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Teradyne, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 13.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $590 vs. price $510), compared to TER's -47.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $243 vs. $358).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.?

TER scores 72/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TER scores 14.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.?

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 6.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Teradyne, Inc.'s 0.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.?

TER earns 32.7% ROIC versus BRK-B's 11.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.