Compare StocksBRK-B vs RMD

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs ResMed Inc. (RMD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. RMD is undervalued at $189, with an intrinsic value of $253 and a margin of safety of 25%. Of the two, RMD has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
RMD
ResMed Inc.
$188.63

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
RMD
  • ResMed Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 62.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ResMed Inc. scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
RMD
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $3.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
RMD
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$1.45B
5.80%
FCF Yield
5.29%
14.56
Trailing P/E
18.17
22.79
Forward P/E
15.56
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
21.07%
10.50%
ROE
25.25%
27.78%
Gross Margin
62.18%
10.06
PEG Ratio
1.14
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.39
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.25%
BRK-B: 5Ties: 1RMD: 6
BRK-BRMD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RMD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RMD
$1.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.79B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RMD
25.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $188.63
Fair Value: $252.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

RMD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $189?

+5.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.5%

The market implies +5.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RMD
96/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RMD
-2.59
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RMD
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 70.0%Retail & Other 29.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,432
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RMD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RMD
5
Sells (3M)
38
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $29.18M
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$968,064
@ $193.96 · 2026-06-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.04M
@ $207.82 · 2026-05-07
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.13M
@ $225.50 · 2026-04-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$224,310
@ $224.31 · 2026-04-01
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$450,000
@ $225.00 · 2026-04-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.25M
@ $251.03 · 2026-03-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$520,440
@ $260.22 · 2026-03-04
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$254,300
@ $254.30 · 2026-03-02
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.37M
@ $273.78 · 2026-02-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$502,620
@ $251.31 · 2026-02-04
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$13,000
@ $260.00 · 2026-02-04
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$257,030
@ $257.03 · 2026-02-02
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$497,660
@ $248.83 · 2026-01-07
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.24M
@ $248.46 · 2026-01-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$241,750
@ $241.75 · 2026-01-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$12,088
@ $241.76 · 2026-01-02
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.25M
@ $251.41 · 2025-12-08
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$502,940
@ $251.47 · 2025-12-03
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$244,160
@ $244.16 · 2025-12-01
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$12,208
@ $244.16 · 2025-12-01
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$524,025
@ $255.00 · 2025-11-25
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$504,100
@ $252.05 · 2025-11-12
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$121,872
@ $250.25 · 2025-11-11
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $249.75 · 2025-11-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$742,620
@ $247.54 · 2025-11-03
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.27M
@ $282.85 · 2025-10-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$823,080
@ $274.36 · 2025-10-01
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$27,436
@ $274.36 · 2025-10-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.23M
@ $278.14 · 2025-09-08
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$812,310
@ $270.77 · 2025-09-02
HERNANDEZ JOHN
Director
$739,289
@ $287.10 · 2025-08-18
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.24M
@ $279.48 · 2025-08-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$845,700
@ $281.90 · 2025-08-01
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$14,095
@ $281.90 · 2025-08-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.06M
@ $256.72 · 2025-07-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$241,438
@ $255.49 · 2025-07-02
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$997,892
@ $256.99 · 2025-07-01
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$16,961
@ $256.98 · 2025-07-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.01M
@ $251.21 · 2025-06-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$494,640
@ $247.32 · 2025-06-04
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$243,780
@ $243.78 · 2025-06-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$9,995
@ $243.78 · 2025-06-02
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$891,286
@ $244.59 · 2025-05-22
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$486,940
@ $243.47 · 2025-05-20
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$484,500
@ $242.25 · 2025-05-07
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.95M
@ $243.23 · 2025-05-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$215,580
@ $215.58 · 2025-04-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.68M
@ $209.85 · 2025-04-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$439,480
@ $219.74 · 2025-04-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$14,263
@ $222.86 · 2025-04-01
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$230,360
@ $230.36 · 2025-03-10
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$2.33M
@ $239.31 · 2025-03-10
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.84M
@ $229.20 · 2025-03-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$455,420
@ $227.71 · 2025-03-05
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$2.15M
@ $235.40 · 2025-03-03
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$14,982
@ $234.09 · 2025-03-03
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$238,980
@ $238.98 · 2025-02-10
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.90M
@ $236.77 · 2025-02-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$484,220
@ $242.11 · 2025-02-05
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$15,515
@ $242.42 · 2025-02-03
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$234,040
@ $234.04 · 2025-01-08
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$461,980
@ $230.99 · 2025-01-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$17,324
@ $230.99 · 2025-01-02
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$244,230
@ $244.23 · 2024-12-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$491,300
@ $245.65 · 2024-12-04
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$18,419
@ $248.91 · 2024-12-02
LEONG JUSTIN
Officer
$1.50M
@ $243.09 · 2024-11-22
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$198,053
@ $248.81 · 2024-11-12
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$249,000
@ $249.00 · 2024-11-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.62M
@ $246.26 · 2024-11-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$497,480
@ $248.74 · 2024-11-06
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$16,698
@ $242.00 · 2024-11-01
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$1.02M
@ $238.48 · 2024-10-11
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$233,470
@ $233.47 · 2024-10-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.41M
@ $231.91 · 2024-10-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$474,400
@ $237.20 · 2024-10-02
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$1.26M
@ $252.56 · 2024-09-12
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$246,420
@ $246.42 · 2024-09-09
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $248.38 · 2024-09-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$479,800
@ $239.90 · 2024-09-04
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$203,742
@ $231.00 · 2024-08-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RMD
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
RMD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView RMD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs RMD

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or ResMed Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, RMD trades at a 25.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $253 vs. price $189), compared to BRK-B's 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $644 vs. $489).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or ResMed Inc.?

RMD scores 96/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. RMD scores 12.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or ResMed Inc.?

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 5.8% free cash flow yield, compared to ResMed Inc.'s 5.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or ResMed Inc.?

RMD earns 21.1% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.