SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs RL

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$481.48
VS
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
$340.21

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.66 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
RL
  • ★Ralph Lauren Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Gross margin of 69.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Ralph Lauren Corporation scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

BRK-B
  • ⚠Berkshire Hathaway Inc. scores only 16/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 15.5x is 75% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
RL
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $17.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
RL
Valuation
$36.80B
Free Cash Flow
$1.02B
3.54%
FCF Yield
4.94%
15.50
Trailing P/E
23.14
22.11
Forward P/E
18.95
Quality & Moat
11.31%
ROIC
21.63%
9.30%
ROE
25.72%
26.15%
Gross Margin
69.65%
N/A
PEG Ratio
0.93
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Debt / Equity
0.99
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.44
N/A
Dividend Yield
1.07%
BRK-B: 4Ties: 1RL: 5
BRK-BRL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

RL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RL
$10.89
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.32B
Δ Market Cap
+$14.35B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $481.48
Fair Value: $699.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RL
14.6% Overvalued
Price is 14.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $340.21
Fair Value: $296.92
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $481?

+0.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.8%

The market implies +0.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

RL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $340?

+12.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.3%

The market implies +12.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
16/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
RL
94/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RL
-2.79
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.5%
No. of Institutional Holders5,852
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RL
Insiders 4.0%Institutions 103.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,086
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RL
2
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $28.56M
ALAGOZ HALIDE
Officer
$405,440
@ $362.00 · 2026-03-04
LOUVET PATRICE
Chief Executive Officer
$16.65M
@ $354.22 · 2026-02-10
ALAGOZ HALIDE
Officer
$688,812
@ $366.00 · 2025-12-02
ALAGOZ HALIDE
Officer
$740,829
@ $317.00 · 2025-09-04
ALAGOZ HALIDE
Officer
$1.56M
@ $295.00 · 2025-08-27
RANFTL ROBERT P
Chief Operating Officer
$3.26M
@ $282.03 · 2025-08-19
LOUVET PATRICE
Chief Executive Officer
$1.81M
@ $240.00 · 2025-05-05
LOUVET PATRICE
Chief Executive Officer
$3.44M
@ $232.50 · 2025-03-24
ALAGOZ HALIDE
Officer
$1.92M
@ $285.00 · 2025-02-18
LOUVET PATRICE
Chief Executive Officer
$5.45M
@ $227.16 · 2024-12-11
LAUREN DAVID R
Officer and Director
$8.32M
@ $221.14 · 2024-11-08
NIELSEN JANE HAMILTON
Chief Operating Officer
$11.52M
@ $171.25 · 2024-05-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
RL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView RL Full Analysis
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io