Compare StocksBRK-B vs RJF

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. RJF is undervalued at $156, with an intrinsic value of $372 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, RJF has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
$155.86

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
RJF
  • Gross margin of 93.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Raymond James Financial, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.34 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
RJF
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.62 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
RJF
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
5.80%
FCF Yield
N/A
14.56
Trailing P/E
14.72
22.79
Forward P/E
11.65
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
12.00%
10.50%
ROE
17.29%
27.78%
Gross Margin
93.03%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.89
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.31%
BRK-B: 0Ties: 2RJF: 7
BRK-BRJF

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RJF

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RJF
$1.84
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.79B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RJF
58.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 58.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $155.86
Fair Value: $372.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

RJF

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RJF
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RJF
-2.56
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RJF
Insiders 10.4%Institutions 81.4%Retail & Other 8.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,285
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RJF
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RJF
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.29M
ALLAIRE BELLA LOYKHTER
Officer
$4.21M
@ $142.34 · 2026-03-19
SANTELLI JONATHAN N
General Counsel
$767,079
@ $170.46 · 2026-02-04
REILLY PAUL C
Officer and Director
$21.32M
@ $163.15 · 2025-12-15
ALLAIRE BELLA LOYKHTER
Officer
$963,228
@ $146.61 · 2025-05-29
BUNN JAMES E.
Officer
$498,184
@ $136.49 · 2025-04-28
SANTELLI JONATHAN N
General Counsel
$699,932
@ $168.25 · 2025-01-31
ELWYN TASHTEGO S
Officer
$1.59M
@ $159.47 · 2024-12-13
SANTELLI JONATHAN N
General Counsel
$513,318
@ $165.59 · 2024-12-05
CARTER HORACE
Officer
$825,147
@ $165.03 · 2024-12-04
REID SHANNON B
Officer
$205,141
@ $165.30 · 2024-12-04
LARSON KATHERINE H.
Officer
$247,691
@ $166.01 · 2024-12-03
ALLAIRE BELLA LOYKHTER
Officer
$769,791
@ $166.59 · 2024-12-03
RANEY STEVEN M
Officer
$2.34M
@ $169.02 · 2024-12-02
REILLY PAUL C
Chief Executive Officer
$8.37M
@ $167.30 · 2024-12-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RJF
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
RJF
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView RJF Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs RJF

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Raymond James Financial, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, RJF trades at a 58.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $372 vs. price $156), compared to BRK-B's 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $644 vs. $489).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Raymond James Financial, Inc.?

RJF scores 93/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Raymond James Financial, Inc. in financial distress?

RJF's Altman Z-Score of 0.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Raymond James Financial, Inc.?

RJF earns 12.0% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

BRK-B vs RJF: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io