Compare StocksBRK-B vs REG

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Regency Centers Corporation (REG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BRK-B is fairly valued at $512, with a DCF intrinsic value of $637 and a margin of safety of 20%. REG is undervalued at $80, with an intrinsic value of $3251903837 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, REG has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$511.54
VS
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
$80.29

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
REG
  • Gross margin of 71.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 30% above the historical average of 11.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
REG
  • PEG ratio of 2.61 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.6x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.04 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
REG
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
5.55%
FCF Yield
N/A
15.22
Trailing P/E
27.03
23.71
Forward P/E
31.81
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
4.29%
10.50%
ROE
8.19%
27.78%
Gross Margin
71.54%
10.06
PEG Ratio
2.61
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.69
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.63
0.00%
Dividend Yield
3.76%
BRK-B: 6Ties: 1REG: 3
BRK-BREG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

REG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
REG
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-193.3M
Δ Market Cap
+$6.53
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
19.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 19.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $511.54
Fair Value: $636.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
REG
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $80.29
Fair Value: $3251903836.79
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $512?

+1.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.5%

The market implies +1.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +2.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

REG

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
REG
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
REG
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.5%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,889
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
REG
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 104.8%
No. of Institutional Holders890
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
REG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
REG
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.30M
DEVEREAUX TERAH L
Officer
$99,367
@ $80.13 · 2026-06-12
WIBBENMEYER NICHOLAS ANDREW
Chief Investment Officer
$626,715
@ $79.06 · 2026-05-05
STEIN MARTIN EDWARD JR
Officer and Director
$763,001
@ $76.30 · 2026-02-20
MAS MICHAEL J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.15M
@ $76.85 · 2026-02-10
PALMER LISA
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $76.75 · 2026-02-10
ROTH ALAN TODD
Chief Operating Officer
$616,400
@ $77.05 · 2026-02-10
STEIN MARTIN EDWARD JR
Officer and Director
$1.05M
@ $70.02 · 2025-11-10
WIBBENMEYER NICHOLAS ANDREW
Chief Investment Officer
$301,206
@ $72.44 · 2025-05-21
MAS MICHAEL J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.47M
@ $73.60 · 2025-02-19
PALMER LISA
Chief Executive Officer
$1.83M
@ $73.26 · 2025-02-19
STEIN MARTIN EDWARD JR
Officer and Director
$1.81M
@ $72.32 · 2025-02-18
HERMAN MICHAEL R.
General Counsel
$69,569
@ $69.57 · 2024-08-16
WIBBENMEYER NICHOLAS ANDREW
Chief Investment Officer
$388,538
@ $70.02 · 2024-08-14
ROTH ALAN TODD
Chief Operating Officer
$299,030
@ $70.36 · 2024-08-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
REG
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
REG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView REG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs REG

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Regency Centers Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, REG trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $3251903837 vs. price $80), compared to BRK-B's 19.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $637 vs. $512).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Regency Centers Corporation?

REG scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Regency Centers Corporation in financial distress?

REG's Altman Z-Score of 0.0 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Regency Centers Corporation?

BRK-B earns 5.0% ROIC versus REG's 4.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.