SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs POOL

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Pool Corporation (POOL)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$481.48
VS
POOL
Pool Corporation
$204.36

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.66 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
POOL
  • ★Pool Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Pool Corporation scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

BRK-B
  • ⚠Berkshire Hathaway Inc. scores only 16/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 15.5x is 75% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
POOL
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 11.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
POOL
Valuation
$36.80B
Free Cash Flow
$309.52M
3.54%
FCF Yield
4.07%
15.50
Trailing P/E
18.84
22.11
Forward P/E
17.18
Quality & Moat
11.31%
ROIC
8.18%
9.30%
ROE
34.29%
26.15%
Gross Margin
29.73%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Debt / Equity
1.30
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.27
N/A
Dividend Yield
2.45%
BRK-B: 5Ties: 1POOL: 4
BRK-BPOOL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

POOL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
POOL
$-4.14
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$831.9M
Δ Market Cap
$-3.44B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $481.48
Fair Value: $699.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
POOL
1.6% Overvalued
Price is 1.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $204.36
Fair Value: $201.23
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $481?

+0.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.8%

The market implies +0.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

POOL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $204?

+9.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.9%

The market implies +9.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
16/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
POOL
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
POOL
-2.15
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.5%
No. of Institutional Holders5,853
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
POOL
Insiders 11.9%Institutions 94.0%
No. of Institutional Holders918
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
POOL
4
Buys (3M)
8
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.67M
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$1.02M
@ $205.00 · 2026-03-13
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$1.09M
@ $218.00 · 2026-03-02
HOPE JAMES D
Director
$300,162
@ $213.64 · 2026-02-25
ST ROMAIN KENNETH G
Officer
$1.22M
@ $218.67 · 2026-02-23
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,996
@ $243.14 · 2025-11-26
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,932
@ $319.00 · 2025-08-28
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$9,005
@ $300.17 · 2025-05-29
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,164
@ $326.56 · 2025-03-26
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$7,966
@ $379.33 · 2024-11-27
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,119
@ $353.00 · 2024-08-29
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$8,148
@ $354.26 · 2024-05-30
WHALEN DAVID G
Director
$6,969
@ $409.94 · 2024-03-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
POOL
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.22M
HART MELANIE M.
Chief Financial Officer
$605,000
@ $220.00 · 2026-02-24
ARVAN PETER D.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.23M
@ $245.57 · 2025-12-02
NEIL JENNIFER M
Officer
$385,245
@ $315.00 · 2025-03-31
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$9.58M
@ $348.41 · 2025-02-25
PEREZ DE LA MESA MANUEL J
Director
$3.46M
@ $346.00 · 2025-02-24
HOUSEY HART MELANIE MONROE
Chief Financial Officer
$799,006
@ $345.59 · 2025-02-24
NEIL JENNIFER M
General Counsel
$256,251
@ $373.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
POOL
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(19/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
POOL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (19)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView POOL Full Analysis