Compare StocksBRK-B vs PH

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$473.01
VS
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$882.23

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.13 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
PH
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 72% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
PH
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • PEG ratio of 3.58 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 8 insider sales totaling $17.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
PH
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$2.77B
6.00%
FCF Yield
2.49%
15.24
Trailing P/E
32.58
21.95
Forward P/E
25.92
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
14.75%
9.18%
ROE
24.16%
27.78%
Gross Margin
37.44%
0.13
PEG Ratio
3.58
Balance Sheet Safety
0.18
Debt / Equity
0.66
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.66
N/A
Dividend Yield
0.91%
BRK-B: 7Ties: 1PH: 3
BRK-BPH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PH
$12.10
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.11B
Δ Market Cap
+$73.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $473.01
Fair Value: $685.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PH
51.8% Overvalued
Price is 51.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $882.23
Fair Value: $581.35
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $473?

-0.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.0%

The market implies -0.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $882?

+15.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.3%

The market implies +15.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +18.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PH
84/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PH
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.6%
No. of Institutional Holders5,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.7%Retail & Other 9.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,412
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PH
8
Sells (3M)
29
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $46.61M
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.13M
@ $1002.13 · 2026-02-13
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$414,777
@ $1006.74 · 2026-02-13
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$1.33M
@ $1001.51 · 2026-02-12
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$818,889
@ $983.06 · 2026-02-12
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.83M
@ $1009.12 · 2026-02-12
LEOMBRUNO TODD M.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.07M
@ $1002.34 · 2026-02-11
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$4.66M
@ $999.00 · 2026-02-11
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$4.69M
@ $996.66 · 2026-02-11
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.25M
@ $950.05 · 2026-02-02
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.38M
@ $946.48 · 2026-02-02
JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
Officer
$535,766
@ $949.94 · 2026-02-02
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$2.24M
@ $941.31 · 2026-01-30
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$1.02M
@ $952.30 · 2026-01-30
ROSS ANDREW D.
Chief Operating Officer
$2.23M
@ $894.81 · 2025-12-11
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$3.03M
@ $864.58 · 2025-11-12
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$1.23M
@ $852.99 · 2025-11-12
REIDY JAY
Officer
$337,675
@ $863.62 · 2025-11-12
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$1.13M
@ $750.00 · 2025-09-02
LEONTI JOSEPH R.
General Counsel
$3.47M
@ $750.84 · 2025-08-25
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$817,477
@ $741.14 · 2025-08-12
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$826,524
@ $729.50 · 2025-08-08
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$589,162
@ $727.36 · 2025-08-08
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$202,506
@ $728.44 · 2025-08-08
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $729.45 · 2025-08-08
JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
Officer
$421,510
@ $733.06 · 2025-08-08
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$3.20M
@ $732.66 · 2025-08-08
MALONE ROBERT W
Officer
$1.65M
@ $730.66 · 2025-08-08
HART MARK J
Officer
$1.65M
@ $730.22 · 2025-08-08
REIDY JAY
Officer
$335,783
@ $675.62 · 2025-05-19
REIDY JAY
Officer
$93,056
@ $620.37 · 2025-05-02
CZAJA MARK T.
Chief Technology Officer
$266,948
@ $711.86 · 2025-01-31
PAREL DINU JOHN
Officer
$1.23M
@ $699.39 · 2024-11-06
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.08M
@ $699.29 · 2024-11-06
ROSS ANDREW D.
Chief Operating Officer
$3.43M
@ $706.04 · 2024-11-06
MALONE ROBERT W
Officer
$2.76M
@ $700.24 · 2024-11-06
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$3.46M
@ $704.69 · 2024-11-06
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.79M
@ $705.40 · 2024-11-06
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$1.70M
@ $701.16 · 2024-11-06
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$825,981
@ $635.37 · 2024-11-04
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$118,773
@ $635.15 · 2024-11-01
LEONTI JOSEPH R.
General Counsel
$3.71M
@ $631.04 · 2024-11-01
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$503,982
@ $592.92 · 2024-08-26
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $588.59 · 2024-08-22
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$1.90M
@ $588.58 · 2024-08-16
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$1.04M
@ $574.86 · 2024-08-14
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$807,685
@ $571.61 · 2024-08-09
HART MARK J
Officer
$1.17M
@ $566.23 · 2024-08-09
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$583,536
@ $567.09 · 2024-08-09
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.24M
@ $543.85 · 2024-05-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
PH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView PH Full Analysis
BRK-B vs PH: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io