SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs PCG

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs PG&E Corporation (PCG)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$473.01
VS
PCG
PG&E Corporation
$16.45

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.13 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
PCG
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.40 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 12.8x is 22% below the historical average of 16.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.32 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • ⚠FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 72% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
PCG
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 11% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 6.0x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.47 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
PCG
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$-5.57B
6.00%
FCF Yield
-15.38%
15.24
Trailing P/E
12.75
21.95
Forward P/E
9.13
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
5.06%
9.18%
ROE
7.74%
27.78%
Gross Margin
39.35%
0.13
PEG Ratio
0.32
Balance Sheet Safety
0.18
Debt / Equity
1.88
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.99
N/A
Dividend Yield
1.22%
BRK-B: 6Ties: 2PCG: 3
BRK-BPCG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PCG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PCG
$0.42
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$7.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.00B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $473.01
Fair Value: $685.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PCG
1476.5% Overvalued
Price is 1476.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $16.45
Fair Value: $1.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $473?

-0.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.0%

The market implies -0.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PCG

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PCG
33/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PCG
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.6%
No. of Institutional Holders5,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PCG
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 99.3%Retail & Other 0.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,221
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PCG
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $119,700
LARSEN JOHN O
Director
$119,700
@ $15.96 · 2025-11-04
DENAULT LEO PAUL
Director
$100,548
@ $15.96 · 2025-03-11
HERNANDEZ CARLOS M.
Director
$49,989
@ $15.91 · 2025-02-25
BAHRI RAJAT
Director
$50,054
@ $15.79 · 2025-02-25
DENECOUR JESSICA L
Director
$21,269
@ $15.79 · 2025-02-21
HARRIS ARNO LOCKHEART
Director
$100,052
@ $15.66 · 2025-02-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PCG
4
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.89M
GLICKMAN JASON M.
Officer
$772,766
@ $16.35 · 2026-04-28
COOPER KERRY WHORTON
Director
$46,700
@ $18.68 · 2026-03-17
PETERMAN CARLA J
Officer
$582,002
@ $18.31 · 2026-03-16
SINGH SUMEET
Officer
$1.02M
@ $18.32 · 2026-03-05
GLICKMAN JASON M.
Divisional Officer
$470,094
@ $15.95 · 2025-10-30
PETERMAN CARLA J
Officer
$562,579
@ $17.30 · 2025-04-29
GLICKMAN JASON M.
Divisional Officer
$632,155
@ $15.71 · 2025-03-10
WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
Officer
$242,891
@ $16.21 · 2025-03-06
SANTOS MARLENE
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$2.06M
@ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
PETERMAN CARLA J
Officer
$532,369
@ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
Officer
$707,170
@ $18.32 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PCG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
PCG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView PCG Full Analysis