Compare StocksBRK-B vs NRG

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$473.01
VS
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
$153.37

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.13 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
NRG
  • Share count has been reduced by 17% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 72% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
NRG
  • ROIC has declined by 6.1 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 19.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 38.3x is 84% above the historical average of 20.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
NRG
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$1.09B
6.00%
FCF Yield
3.35%
15.24
Trailing P/E
38.34
21.95
Forward P/E
13.53
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
5.64%
9.18%
ROE
47.41%
27.78%
Gross Margin
19.38%
0.13
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
0.18
Debt / Equity
9.89
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.02
N/A
Dividend Yield
1.24%
BRK-B: 7Ties: 1NRG: 3
BRK-BNRG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

NRG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NRG
$39.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$590.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$23.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $473.01
Fair Value: $685.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NRG
19.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 19.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $153.37
Fair Value: $189.67
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $473?

-0.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.0%

The market implies -0.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

NRG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $153?

+20.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.4%

The market implies +20.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
NRG
42/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NRG
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.6%
No. of Institutional Holders5,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NRG
Insiders 4.4%Institutions 86.7%Retail & Other 8.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,441
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NRG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NRG
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $33.85M
KINNEY VIRGINIA
Officer
$783,250
@ $156.65 · 2026-03-16
CHUNG BRUCE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.94M
@ $156.56 · 2026-01-07
CURCI BRIAN
General Counsel
$17.26M
@ $160.46 · 2026-01-06
CHUNG BRUCE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.21M
@ $158.79 · 2026-01-06
KINNEY VIRGINIA
Officer
$3.28M
@ $163.82 · 2025-11-14
LIYANEARACHCHI DAK
Chief Technology Officer
$1.65M
@ $155.00 · 2025-09-10
HOWELL KEVIN T
Director
$7.72M
@ $154.50 · 2025-05-30
CHUNG BRUCE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.95M
@ $97.63 · 2025-01-13
GAUDETTE ROBERT J
Officer
$5.48M
@ $91.41 · 2025-01-02
DONOHUE ELISABETH B
Director
$99,154
@ $91.64 · 2024-11-14
PATEL RASESH M.
Officer
$8.24M
@ $80.35 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NRG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
NRG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView NRG Full Analysis
BRK-B vs NRG: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io