Compare StocksBRK-B vs NEM

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Newmont Corporation (NEM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. NEM is overvalued at $104, with an intrinsic value of $39 and a margin of safety of -169%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
NEM
Newmont Corporation
$103.79

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
NEM
  • Gross margin of 67.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 88.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $19.40 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
NEM
  • Share count has increased by 37% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • PEG ratio of 2.78 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $2.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
NEM
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$9.80B
5.80%
FCF Yield
8.85%
14.56
Trailing P/E
13.46
22.79
Forward P/E
9.11
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
29.80%
10.50%
ROE
25.83%
27.78%
Gross Margin
67.36%
10.06
PEG Ratio
2.78
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.20
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.96%
BRK-B: 3Ties: 1NEM: 8
BRK-BNEM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NEM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NEM
$16.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.27B
Δ Market Cap
+$71.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NEM
39.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 39.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $103.79
Fair Value: $172.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

NEM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $104?

+4.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.6%

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NEM
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NEM
-2.68
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NEM
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 81.4%Retail & Other 18.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,575
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NEM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
CONGER HARRY M IV
Director
$400,335
@ $42.15 · 2024-11-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NEM
5
Sells (3M)
20
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.04M
TOTH PETER
Officer
$315,960
@ $105.32 · 2026-06-01
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Executive Officer
$408,852
@ $105.32 · 2026-06-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$330,330
@ $110.11 · 2026-05-01
WEXLER PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$1.47M
@ $110.11 · 2026-05-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$339,270
@ $113.09 · 2026-04-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$324,000
@ $108.00 · 2026-03-18
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$164,382
@ $120.78 · 2026-03-03
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$268,968
@ $131.14 · 2026-03-02
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$577,590
@ $130.00 · 2026-02-27
RODGERS MARK C
Officer
$643,375
@ $125.00 · 2026-02-25
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$192,109
@ $92.36 · 2025-12-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$406,700
@ $81.34 · 2025-11-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$168,397
@ $80.96 · 2025-11-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$176,779
@ $84.99 · 2025-10-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$154,923
@ $74.59 · 2025-09-02
TABOLT BRIAN
Officer
$477,160
@ $68.02 · 2025-08-06
TOTH PETER
Officer
$190,980
@ $63.66 · 2025-08-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$132,222
@ $63.66 · 2025-08-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$176,250
@ $58.75 · 2025-07-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$122,024
@ $58.75 · 2025-07-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$162,270
@ $54.09 · 2025-06-02
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$112,345
@ $54.09 · 2025-06-02
TOTH PETER
Officer
$154,440
@ $51.48 · 2025-05-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$106,924
@ $51.48 · 2025-05-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$145,380
@ $48.46 · 2025-04-01
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$100,651
@ $48.46 · 2025-04-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$131,130
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$340,894
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$90,786
@ $43.71 · 2025-03-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$128,670
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$386,010
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$89,083
@ $42.89 · 2025-02-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$120,000
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$360,000
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
BROOK BRUCE R
Director
$83,080
@ $40.00 · 2025-01-10
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$540,670
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
VILJOEN NATASCHA
Chief Operating Officer
$374,310
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
TOTH PETER
Officer
$124,770
@ $41.59 · 2024-12-02
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$590,850
@ $45.45 · 2024-11-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$136,350
@ $45.45 · 2024-11-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$1.08M
@ $53.81 · 2024-10-01
TOTH PETER
Officer
$161,430
@ $53.81 · 2024-10-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$1.05M
@ $52.47 · 2024-09-03
TOTH PETER
Officer
$157,410
@ $52.47 · 2024-09-03
CAGE JOSHUA
Officer
$49,150
@ $49.15 · 2024-08-14
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$990,250
@ $49.51 · 2024-08-01
PALMER THOMAS RONALD
Chief Executive Officer
$547,690
@ $42.13 · 2024-07-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NEM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
NEM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView NEM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs NEM

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Newmont Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to NEM's -169.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $39 vs. $104).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Newmont Corporation?

BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat), while NEM scores 31/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NEM scores 4.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Newmont Corporation?

Newmont Corporation (NEM) generates a 8.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s 5.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Newmont Corporation?

NEM earns 29.8% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.