SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs MOH

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$468.52
VS
MOH
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
$195.53

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.13 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
MOH
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 4.26 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -8.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

BRK-B
  • ⚠FCF yield of 6.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 15.1x is 70% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
MOH
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 12.7 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Gross margin of 8.9% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
MOH
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$757.50M
6.06%
FCF Yield
7.44%
15.10
Trailing P/E
52.28
21.74
Forward P/E
22.04
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
7.25%
9.18%
ROE
11.57%
27.78%
Gross Margin
8.86%
0.13
PEG Ratio
1.79
Balance Sheet Safety
0.18
Debt / Equity
0.97
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
-8.34
N/A
Dividend Yield
N/A
BRK-B: 5Ties: 2MOH: 4
BRK-BMOH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

MOH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MOH
$-3.73
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.74B
Δ Market Cap
$-10.23B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $468.52
Fair Value: $685.42
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MOH
74.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 74.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $195.53
Fair Value: $760.47
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $469?

-0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.8%

The market implies -0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +0.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MOH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $196?

-1.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -8.2%

The market implies -1.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -8.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
MOH
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MOH
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.6%
No. of Institutional Holders5,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MOH
Insiders 1.5%Institutions 104.9%
No. of Institutional Holders802
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MOH
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.66M
ZORETIC RICHARD C
Director
$100,128
@ $125.16 · 2026-02-11
WOYS JAMES E
Chief Operating Officer
$1.56M
@ $155.94 · 2025-08-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MOH
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,058
SCHAPIRO RICHARD M
Director
$51,058
@ $143.02 · 2025-11-24
SCHAPIRO RICHARD M
Director
$214,414
@ $320.50 · 2025-04-29
SCHAPIRO RICHARD M
Director
$39,810
@ $292.72 · 2024-11-18
HEBERT MAURICE S
Officer
$136,182
@ $346.52 · 2024-08-15
BARLOW JEFF D
Officer
$1.79M
@ $335.00 · 2024-07-29
WOYS JAMES E
Chief Operating Officer
$3.45M
@ $345.15 · 2024-05-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MOH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
MOH
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView MOH Full Analysis
BRK-B vs MOH: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io