Compare StocksBRK-B vs LW

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BRK-B is fairly valued at $512, with a DCF intrinsic value of $637 and a margin of safety of 20%. LW is overvalued at $53, with an intrinsic value of $27 and a margin of safety of -95%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$511.54
VS
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$52.55

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
LW
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 71.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • 7 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
  • PEG ratio of 0.86 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 30% above the historical average of 11.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
LW
  • Gross margin of 20.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 6.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 25.3x is 43% above the historical average of 17.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
LW
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$452.92M
5.55%
FCF Yield
6.27%
15.22
Trailing P/E
25.26
23.71
Forward P/E
15.48
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
8.71%
10.50%
ROE
16.28%
27.78%
Gross Margin
20.68%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.86
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
2.17
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.59
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.89%
BRK-B: 5Ties: 1LW: 6
BRK-BLW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LW
$-10.87
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$784.3M
Δ Market Cap
$-8.52B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
19.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 19.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $511.54
Fair Value: $636.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LW
95.2% Overvalued
Price is 95.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $52.55
Fair Value: $26.91
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $512?

+1.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.5%

The market implies +1.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +2.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

LW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $53?

+16.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.6%

The market implies +16.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LW
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LW
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.5%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,889
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LW
Insiders 2.9%Institutions 99.1%
No. of Institutional Holders775
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LW
1
Buys (3M)
7
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $19.42M
GRAY JAMES D.
Chief Financial Officer
$409,225
@ $40.92 · 2026-05-11
GRAY JAMES D.
Chief Financial Officer
$199,781
@ $43.85 · 2026-04-27
JANA PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Unknown
$6.37M
@ $42.48 · 2026-04-15
JANA PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, L.P.
Unknown
$9.70M
@ $41.11 · 2026-04-08
PRESTAGE NORMAN
Director
$103,500
@ $41.40 · 2026-04-07
BENSEN PETER J
Director
$197,225
@ $39.45 · 2026-04-06
CRAPS JAN ELI B.
Officer and Director
$2.43M
@ $48.65 · 2026-02-06
NIBLOCK ROBERT A
Director
$182,819
@ $60.94 · 2025-01-13
JURGENSEN WILLIAM GERALD
Director
$316,350
@ $63.27 · 2024-12-23
BLIXT CHARLES A
Director
$75,901
@ $63.25 · 2024-12-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LW
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $99,973
JONES GREGORY W
Officer
$99,973
@ $62.48 · 2025-10-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LW
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
LW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView LW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs LW

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 19.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $637 vs. price $512), compared to LW's -95.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $27 vs. $53).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.?

LW scores 46/100 (Narrow moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LW scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.?

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) generates a 6.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s 5.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.?

LW earns 8.7% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

BRK-B vs LW: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io