Compare StocksBRK-B vs LH

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$481.48
VS
LH
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$264.09

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.66 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
LH
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.13 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BRK-B
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc. scores only 16/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.5x is 75% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
LH
  • 8 insider sales totaling $4.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 7.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
LH
Valuation
$36.80B
Free Cash Flow
$966.63M
3.54%
FCF Yield
4.42%
15.50
Trailing P/E
25.25
22.11
Forward P/E
13.70
Quality & Moat
11.31%
ROIC
7.67%
9.30%
ROE
10.15%
26.15%
Gross Margin
28.76%
N/A
PEG Ratio
1.61
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Debt / Equity
0.76
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.73
N/A
Dividend Yield
1.09%
BRK-B: 5Ties: 1LH: 4
BRK-BLH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

LH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LH
$2.13
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.30B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $481.48
Fair Value: $699.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LH
60.6% Overvalued
Price is 60.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $264.09
Fair Value: $164.49
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $481?

+0.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.8%

The market implies +0.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

LH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $264?

+14.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.7%

The market implies +14.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
16/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
LH
52/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LH
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.5%
No. of Institutional Holders5,852
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LH
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 100.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,392
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LH
8
Sells (3M)
23
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.92M
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$2.44M
@ $279.96 · 2026-03-03
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$156,000
@ $285.19 · 2026-02-27
CAVENEY BRIAN J
Officer
$429,458
@ $286.31 · 2026-02-24
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$185,108
@ $277.94 · 2026-02-19
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$25,267
@ $290.43 · 2026-02-12
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $284.38 · 2026-02-11
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$25,188
@ $276.79 · 2026-02-10
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$24,247
@ $275.53 · 2026-02-09
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $262.75 · 2025-11-11
PARHAM RICHELLE P
Director
$1.78M
@ $254.28 · 2025-10-31
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$1.06M
@ $271.42 · 2025-08-13
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $266.78 · 2025-08-11
GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
Director
$529,900
@ $264.95 · 2025-07-30
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$52,727
@ $261.02 · 2025-07-29
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$980,000
@ $280.00 · 2025-07-24
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$132,500
@ $265.00 · 2025-07-01
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$130,000
@ $260.00 · 2025-06-11
CAVENEY BRIAN J
Officer
$494,000
@ $247.00 · 2025-06-03
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.52M
@ $248.73 · 2025-05-12
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$452,884
@ $238.36 · 2025-05-01
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$200,838
@ $242.27 · 2025-05-01
SCHROEDER MARK S
Chief Operating Officer
$610,450
@ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$175,606
@ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$127,817
@ $255.63 · 2025-03-05
SCHROEDER MARK S
President
$1.33M
@ $249.23 · 2025-02-28
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$330,208
@ $251.30 · 2025-02-25
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$56,590
@ $250.40 · 2025-02-24
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$347,739
@ $246.10 · 2025-02-18
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $244.62 · 2025-02-11
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$235,000
@ $235.00 · 2025-01-07
EISENBERG GLENN A
Officer
$2.82M
@ $240.43 · 2024-12-02
GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
Director
$241,000
@ $241.00 · 2024-12-02
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$877,142
@ $238.94 · 2024-11-22
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$239,419
@ $239.42 · 2024-11-21
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.47 · 2024-11-11
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$230,000
@ $230.00 · 2024-10-24
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$454,100
@ $227.05 · 2024-08-19
EISENBERG GLENN A
Chief Financial Officer
$3.36M
@ $223.99 · 2024-08-15
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$225,000
@ $225.00 · 2024-08-08
BERBERIAN LANCE V
Chief Technology Officer
$2.77M
@ $229.10 · 2024-08-05
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$421,655
@ $210.83 · 2024-05-14
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$101,058
@ $202.12 · 2024-05-02
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$498,358
@ $204.33 · 2024-04-29
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$760,515
@ $217.29 · 2024-04-01
SCHROEDER MARK S
Officer
$1.41M
@ $217.29 · 2024-04-01
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$770,077
@ $216.74 · 2024-03-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
LH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView LH Full Analysis
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io