Compare StocksBRK-B vs IFF

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$481.48
VS
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
$68.13

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.66 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
IFF
  • Insiders have bought $12.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.
  • FCF yield of 17.7% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

BRK-B
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc. scores only 16/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.5x is 75% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
IFF
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.34 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
IFF
Valuation
$36.80B
Free Cash Flow
$3.09B
3.54%
FCF Yield
17.74%
15.50
Trailing P/E
N/A
22.11
Forward P/E
14.18
Quality & Moat
11.31%
ROIC
1.91%
9.30%
ROE
-2.64%
26.15%
Gross Margin
36.16%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Debt / Equity
0.47
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.26
N/A
Dividend Yield
2.35%
BRK-B: 5Ties: 1IFF: 3
BRK-BIFF

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

IFF

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
IFF
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-4.44B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.50B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $481.48
Fair Value: $699.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
IFF
71.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 71.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $68.13
Fair Value: $240.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $481?

+0.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.8%

The market implies +0.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

IFF

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $68?

-5.8%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
16/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
IFF
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
IFF
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.5%
No. of Institutional Holders5,852
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
IFF
Insiders 1.8%Institutions 103.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,029
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
IFF
2
Buys (3M)
10
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $17.64M
FYRWALD J. ERIK
Chief Executive Officer
$995,204
@ $69.79 · 2026-03-13
FRIBOURG PAUL J
Director
$10.97M
@ $70.12 · 2026-03-12
LANDSMAN STEPHEN N
General Counsel
$196,788
@ $63.48 · 2025-12-12
FRIBOURG PAUL J
Director
$1.00M
@ $64.80 · 2025-08-07
FYRWALD J. ERIK
Chief Executive Officer
$993,714
@ $64.95 · 2025-08-07
O'BYRNE KEVIN
Director
$342,240
@ $76.05 · 2025-05-22
LANDSMAN STEPHEN N
General Counsel
$927,356
@ $77.28 · 2025-05-19
PALAU HERNANDEZ MARGARITA
Director
$65,807
@ $77.42 · 2025-05-19
KHAN MEHMOOD
Director
$301,314
@ $75.33 · 2025-05-15
FYRWALD J. ERIK
Chief Executive Officer
$1.85M
@ $73.97 · 2025-05-09
O'BYRNE KEVIN
Director
$522,833
@ $80.44 · 2025-03-05
FYRWALD J. ERIK
Chief Executive Officer
$2.01M
@ $80.24 · 2025-03-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
IFF
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $185,604
YILDIZ BERIL
Officer
$185,604
@ $77.33 · 2025-05-19
ARORA YUVRAJ
Officer
$458,775
@ $91.75 · 2024-11-11
STRZELECKI ANGELA
Officer
$247,560
@ $95.66 · 2024-06-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
IFF
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
IFF
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView IFF Full Analysis
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io