Compare StocksBRK-B vs HRL

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BRK-B is fairly valued at $512, with a DCF intrinsic value of $637 and a margin of safety of 20%. HRL is undervalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $8771803309 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, HRL has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$511.54
VS
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
$25.01

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
HRL
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -0.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 30% above the historical average of 11.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
HRL
  • Gross margin of 15.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 14.5% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
HRL
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$471.17M
5.55%
FCF Yield
N/A
15.22
Trailing P/E
29.42
23.71
Forward P/E
16.04
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
17.38%
10.50%
ROE
5.83%
27.78%
Gross Margin
15.78%
10.06
PEG Ratio
1.76
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.26
0.00%
Dividend Yield
4.68%
BRK-B: 6Ties: 1HRL: 4
BRK-BHRL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

HRL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
HRL
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$235.7M
Δ Market Cap
$-21.85
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
19.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 19.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $511.54
Fair Value: $636.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
HRL
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $8771803308.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $512?

+1.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.5%

The market implies +1.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +2.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

HRL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-30.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -30.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
HRL
50/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
HRL
-2.61
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.5%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,889
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
HRL
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 5.7%
No. of Institutional Holders872
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
HRL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
LYKKEN STEVEN J
Officer
$159,246
@ $32.47 · 2024-12-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
HRL
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $321,600
MURANO ELSA A
Director
$321,600
@ $24.00 · 2025-12-11
MURANO ELSA A
Director
$136,800
@ $30.40 · 2025-03-27
LYKKEN STEVEN J
Officer
$312,689
@ $31.91 · 2024-09-27
MYERS KEVIN L.
Officer
$327,000
@ $32.70 · 2024-09-18
BRADY DEANNA T
Officer
$1.65M
@ $31.95 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
HRL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
HRL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView HRL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs HRL

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Hormel Foods Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HRL trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $8771803309 vs. price $25), compared to BRK-B's 19.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $637 vs. $512).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Hormel Foods Corporation?

HRL scores 50/100 (Narrow moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Hormel Foods Corporation in financial distress?

HRL's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Hormel Foods Corporation?

HRL earns 17.4% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.