Compare StocksBRK-B vs HOOD

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BRK-B is fairly valued at $511, with a DCF intrinsic value of $590 and a margin of safety of 13%. HOOD is undervalued at $107, with an intrinsic value of $163 and a margin of safety of 34%. Of the two, HOOD has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$510.74
VS
HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
$107.42

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -1.8x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
HOOD
  • Gross margin of 91.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.86 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 6.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
HOOD
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • Beneish M-Score of -1.59 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
  • 11 insider sales totaling $54.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
HOOD
Valuation
$71.98B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
6.58%
FCF Yield
N/A
12.85
Trailing P/E
47.53
23.01
Forward P/E
31.74
Quality & Moat
11.26%
ROIC
5.27%
12.12%
ROE
23.62%
30.33%
Gross Margin
91.89%
10.06
PEG Ratio
2.00
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.81
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BRK-B: 4Ties: 1HOOD: 4
BRK-BHOOD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

HOOD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.64
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$414.76B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
HOOD
$34.39
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.75B
Δ Market Cap
+$94.67B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
13.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 13.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $510.74
Fair Value: $589.58
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
HOOD
34.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 34.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $107.42
Fair Value: $162.87
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $511?

+1.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.6%

The market implies +1.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +0.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

HOOD

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
HOOD
45/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
HOOD
-1.59
Likely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.9%Retail & Other 32.8%
No. of Institutional Holders5,947
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
HOOD
Insiders 1.0%Institutions 79.4%Retail & Other 19.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,857
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $500,617
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,072
@ $512.44 · 2026-08-12
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
HOOD
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $55.31M
MALKA MEYER
Director
$20.18M
@ $80.74 · 2026-06-05
MALKA MEYER
Director
$15.10M
@ $83.45 · 2026-06-03
MALKA MEYER
Director
$20.02M
@ $80.39 · 2026-05-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
HOOD
11
Sells (3M)
48
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $346.05M
TRESEDER OLUWADARA JOHNSON
Director
$234,375
@ $125.00 · 2026-09-08
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$2.94M
@ $120.33 · 2026-09-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.22M
@ $122.43 · 2026-09-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$378,569
@ $95.07 · 2026-08-17
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$904,192
@ $90.42 · 2026-08-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$456,775
@ $114.71 · 2026-07-15
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.16M
@ $116.14 · 2026-07-06
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$43.56M
@ $116.17 · 2026-07-06
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$2.32M
@ $119.96 · 2026-07-02
TRESEDER OLUWADARA JOHNSON
Director
$440,625
@ $117.50 · 2026-07-02
LOOP PAULA
Director
$1.00M
@ $120.00 · 2026-07-02
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$393,779
@ $98.84 · 2026-06-15
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$931,024
@ $85.91 · 2026-06-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$836,771
@ $83.68 · 2026-06-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$420,536
@ $77.36 · 2026-05-15
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$768,908
@ $76.89 · 2026-05-04
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$489,687
@ $83.92 · 2026-04-27
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$725,302
@ $84.93 · 2026-04-15
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$466,717
@ $85.86 · 2026-04-15
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$698,451
@ $69.85 · 2026-04-06
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$26.19M
@ $69.83 · 2026-04-06
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$407,575
@ $69.85 · 2026-04-06
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$416,392
@ $71.36 · 2026-03-20
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$407,855
@ $75.00 · 2026-03-16
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$469,822
@ $80.50 · 2026-03-05
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$754,903
@ $75.49 · 2026-03-03
VERMA SHIV
Chief Financial Officer
$411,274
@ $75.13 · 2026-02-17
WARNICK JASON
Former
$10.64M
@ $85.09 · 2026-02-09
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$4.61M
@ $87.81 · 2026-02-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$870,665
@ $87.07 · 2026-02-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$630,284
@ $107.48 · 2026-01-26
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.22M
@ $121.58 · 2026-01-05
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$45.61M
@ $121.63 · 2026-01-05
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$712,984
@ $121.59 · 2026-01-05
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$717,689
@ $122.39 · 2025-12-22
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$775,711
@ $132.26 · 2025-12-05
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.55M
@ $131.15 · 2025-12-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$15.86M
@ $132.13 · 2025-12-03
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$6.07M
@ $121.33 · 2025-11-26
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$1.13M
@ $112.98 · 2025-11-24
WARNICK JASON
Chief Financial Officer
$39.84M
@ $132.81 · 2025-11-11
QUIRK STEVEN M
Officer
$6.80M
@ $140.61 · 2025-11-04
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.65M
@ $145.95 · 2025-11-03
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$861,460
@ $146.91 · 2025-10-27
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$865,118
@ $147.53 · 2025-10-06
GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR
Officer
$3.71M
@ $148.34 · 2025-10-03
TENEV VLADIMIR
Chief Executive Officer
$104.80M
@ $139.73 · 2025-10-01
PINNER JEFFREY TSVI
Chief Technology Officer
$727,872
@ $124.13 · 2025-09-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
HOOD
FearGreed
😨Fear(40/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
HOOD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView HOOD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs HOOD

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Robinhood Markets, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HOOD trades at a 34.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $163 vs. price $107), compared to BRK-B's 13.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $590 vs. $511).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Robinhood Markets, Inc.?

HOOD scores 45/100 (Narrow moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. HOOD scores 2.6 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Robinhood Markets, Inc.?

BRK-B earns 11.3% ROIC versus HOOD's 5.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Does Robinhood Markets, Inc. have accounting red flags?

HOOD's Beneish M-Score of -1.6 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, BRK-B scores -2.4, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.