Compare StocksBRK-B vs GPN

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Global Payments Inc. (GPN)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$473.01
VS
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
$72.36

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.13 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
GPN
  • Gross margin of 72.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.47 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 72% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
GPN
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.0x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.88 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
GPN
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$1.75B
6.00%
FCF Yield
8.78%
15.24
Trailing P/E
16.33
21.95
Forward P/E
4.47
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
3.69%
9.18%
ROE
5.89%
27.78%
Gross Margin
72.64%
0.13
PEG Ratio
0.21
Balance Sheet Safety
0.18
Debt / Equity
0.93
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.03
N/A
Dividend Yield
1.38%
BRK-B: 7Ties: 1GPN: 3
BRK-BGPN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

GPN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GPN
$-2.44
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$3.20B
Δ Market Cap
$-7.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $473.01
Fair Value: $685.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GPN
50.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $72.36
Fair Value: $147.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $473?

-0.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.0%

The market implies -0.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

GPN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $72?

+10.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.2%

The market implies +10.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +7.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
GPN
42/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GPN
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.6%
No. of Institutional Holders5,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GPN
Insiders 0.9%Institutions 100.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,164
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GPN
1
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.29M
JOHNSON JOIA M
Director
$99,345
@ $81.90 · 2026-02-20
BALDWIN ROBERT H B JR
Director
$1.09M
@ $81.16 · 2025-12-11
WATSON PATRICIA A
Director
$99,905
@ $75.06 · 2025-11-07
BALDWIN ROBERT H B JR
Director
$672,800
@ $116.00 · 2024-12-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GPN
0
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.36M
SHEFFIELD DAVID M
Officer
$164,123
@ $81.41 · 2025-12-11
GREEN DAVID LAWRENCE
Officer
$927,884
@ $79.99 · 2025-12-03
MCDANIEL CONNIE D
Director
$347,344
@ $77.81 · 2025-11-12
CORTOPASSI ROBERT M
President
$342,080
@ $85.52 · 2025-08-21
SHEFFIELD DAVID M
Officer
$207,575
@ $83.03 · 2025-08-12
STEELE-BELKIN DARA L.
General Counsel
$172,000
@ $86.00 · 2025-08-07
SHEFFIELD DAVID M
Officer
$201,975
@ $80.79 · 2025-05-08
CARTER ANDREA M
Officer
$250,015
@ $105.67 · 2024-11-04
GREEN DAVID LAWRENCE
Officer
$3.27M
@ $104.55 · 2024-10-31
SHEFFIELD DAVID M
Officer
$166,305
@ $100.73 · 2024-08-08
JOHNSTON SHANNON A
Chief Technology Officer
$169,816
@ $98.33 · 2024-06-06
CARTER ANDREA M
Officer
$367,422
@ $111.34 · 2024-05-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GPN
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
GPN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView GPN Full Analysis