Compare StocksBRK-B vs GM

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs General Motors Company (GM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. GM is fairly valued at $79, with an intrinsic value of $92 and a margin of safety of 14%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
GM
General Motors Company
$79.29

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
GM
  • Share count has been reduced by 35% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • FCF yield of 31.4% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • PEG ratio of 0.35 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
GM
  • Gross margin of 11.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • General Motors Company scores only 27/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Trailing P/E of 28.9x is 169% above the historical average of 10.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
GM
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$22.47B
5.80%
FCF Yield
31.42%
14.58
Trailing P/E
28.94
22.79
Forward P/E
5.63
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
7.06%
10.50%
ROE
4.01%
27.78%
Gross Margin
11.14%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.35
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
1.61
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.71
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.91%
BRK-B: 6Ties: 1GM: 5
BRK-BGM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GM
$1.56
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$16.93B
Δ Market Cap
+$26.42B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GM
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $79.29
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

GM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $79?

+23.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -5.4%

The market implies +23.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -5.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GM
27/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GM
-2.36
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GM
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.1%Retail & Other 10.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,042
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
KELLY ALFRED FRANCIS JR.
Director
$607,920
@ $50.66 · 2025-01-30
JACOBSON PAUL A
Chief Financial Officer
$1.10M
@ $44.11 · 2024-07-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GM
8
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $183.08M
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$8.45M
@ $85.10 · 2026-06-16
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$1.75M
@ $85.00 · 2026-06-09
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$1.96M
@ $85.00 · 2026-05-29
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$586,075
@ $85.00 · 2026-05-28
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$37.19M
@ $82.03 · 2026-05-28
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$775,266
@ $84.97 · 2026-05-28
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$7.05M
@ $82.79 · 2026-05-27
JACOBSON PAUL A
Chief Financial Officer
$3.20M
@ $80.00 · 2026-05-26
REUSS MARK L
President
$38.71M
@ $80.52 · 2026-02-17
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$556,128
@ $72.00 · 2025-11-12
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.10M
@ $70.00 · 2025-10-28
REUSS MARK L
President
$17.32M
@ $66.45 · 2025-10-22
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.43M
@ $61.01 · 2025-09-26
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$408,870
@ $61.95 · 2025-09-26
REUSS MARK L
President
$9.80M
@ $60.10 · 2025-09-25
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$46.61M
@ $59.95 · 2025-09-24
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$1.77M
@ $59.92 · 2025-09-12
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$267,317
@ $59.95 · 2025-09-12
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$865,353
@ $59.00 · 2025-08-27
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$2.03M
@ $55.10 · 2025-08-13
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$1.27M
@ $53.01 · 2025-08-05
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$535,229
@ $60.01 · 2024-11-25
GLIDDEN CRAIG B
General Counsel
$21.70M
@ $56.63 · 2024-11-18
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$11.91M
@ $57.60 · 2024-11-11
REUSS MARK L
President
$6.75M
@ $55.16 · 2024-11-06
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$27.03M
@ $53.33 · 2024-10-23
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$502,671
@ $54.01 · 2024-10-23
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$736,061
@ $48.76 · 2024-08-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
GM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView GM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs GM

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or General Motors Company more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to GM's 13.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $92 vs. $79).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or General Motors Company?

BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat), while GM scores 27/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is General Motors Company in financial distress?

GM's Altman Z-Score of 1.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or General Motors Company?

General Motors Company (GM) generates a 31.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s 5.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or General Motors Company?

GM earns 7.1% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.