Compare StocksBRK-B vs FTV

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Fortive Corporation (FTV): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. FTV is overvalued at $61, with an intrinsic value of $30 and a margin of safety of -106%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
FTV
Fortive Corporation
$61.03

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
FTV
  • Gross margin of 63.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • PEG ratio of 0.98 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
FTV
  • FCF yield of 5.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 35.9x is 43% above the historical average of 25.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
FTV
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$953.61M
5.80%
FCF Yield
5.13%
14.56
Trailing P/E
35.90
22.79
Forward P/E
18.95
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
6.20%
10.50%
ROE
6.81%
27.78%
Gross Margin
63.25%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.98
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.53
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.71
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.33%
BRK-B: 6Ties: 1FTV: 5
BRK-BFTV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

FTV

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
FTV
$0.11
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$1.97B
Δ Market Cap
+$216.3M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
FTV
106.3% Overvalued
Price is 106.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $61.03
Fair Value: $29.58
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

FTV

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $61?

+16.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.6%

The market implies +16.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
FTV
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
FTV
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
FTV
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 111.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,136
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
FTV
1
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.00M
LASSITER WRIGHT III
Director
$257.00
@ $64.25 · 2026-03-26
LASSITER WRIGHT III
Director
$257.00
@ $64.25 · 2025-12-26
OKERSTROM MARK D
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $47.03 · 2025-08-01
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
FTV
1
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.40M
UNDERWOOD PETER C
Officer
$2.89M
@ $60.81 · 2026-05-04
MITCHELL KATE D
Director
$416,023
@ $58.34 · 2026-02-18
UNDERWOOD PETER C
Officer
$2.98M
@ $51.28 · 2025-11-10
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$110,367
@ $50.35 · 2025-10-31
LICO JAMES A
Chief Executive Officer
$12.67M
@ $72.40 · 2025-05-15
UNDERWOOD PETER C
Officer
$1.06M
@ $73.88 · 2025-05-12
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$237,308
@ $79.05 · 2025-02-28
MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.53M
@ $78.86 · 2025-02-28
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$457,998
@ $80.52 · 2025-02-26
LICO JAMES A
Chief Executive Officer
$15.76M
@ $80.38 · 2025-02-24
UNDERWOOD PETER C
General Counsel
$382,900
@ $76.58 · 2024-11-11
WALKER STACEY A.
Officer
$12.32M
@ $71.71 · 2024-11-01
MCLAUGHLIN CHARLES E.
Chief Financial Officer
$508,142
@ $74.03 · 2024-09-13
SCHWARZ JONATHAN L.
Officer
$1.05M
@ $73.80 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
FTV
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
FTV
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView FTV Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs FTV

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Fortive Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to FTV's -106.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $30 vs. $61).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Fortive Corporation?

FTV scores 49/100 (Narrow moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. FTV scores 3.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Fortive Corporation?

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 5.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Fortive Corporation's 5.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Fortive Corporation?

FTV earns 6.2% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.