Compare StocksBRK-B vs FSLR

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs First Solar, Inc. (FSLR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. FSLR is undervalued at $258, with an intrinsic value of $1097 and a margin of safety of 77%. Of the two, FSLR has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
$257.70

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
FSLR
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.79 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.69 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 6.29 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
FSLR
  • 22 insider sales totaling $11.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
FSLR
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$1.15B
5.80%
FCF Yield
4.14%
14.56
Trailing P/E
16.64
22.79
Forward P/E
11.01
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
13.53%
10.50%
ROE
18.44%
27.78%
Gross Margin
41.74%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.69
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.81
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BRK-B: 5Ties: 1FSLR: 6
BRK-BFSLR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

FSLR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
FSLR
$3.30
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.65B
Δ Market Cap
+$12.06B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
FSLR
76.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 76.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $257.70
Fair Value: $1097.36
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

FSLR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $258?

+5.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.3%

The market implies +5.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +9.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
FSLR
45/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
FSLR
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
FSLR
Insiders 5.4%Institutions 94.2%Retail & Other 0.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,509
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
FSLR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
FSLR
22
Sells (3M)
68
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $44.28M
BUEHLER PATRICK JAMES
Officer
$906,000
@ $302.00 · 2026-06-02
STOCKDALE CAROLINE
Officer
$2.93M
@ $275.60 · 2026-05-28
WIDMAR MARK R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.90M
@ $264.89 · 2026-05-26
WIDMAR MARK R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.19M
@ $247.43 · 2026-05-21
VERMA KUNTAL KUMAR
Officer
$145,500
@ $250.00 · 2026-05-21
WIDMAR MARK R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.63M
@ $234.00 · 2026-05-13
VERMA KUNTAL KUMAR
Officer
$849,560
@ $231.42 · 2026-05-13
DYMBORT JASON E
General Counsel
$49,740
@ $218.16 · 2026-05-06
VERMA KUNTAL KUMAR
Officer
$58,903
@ $218.16 · 2026-05-06
THEURER NATHAN B
Officer
$6,763
@ $218.16 · 2026-05-06
WIDMAR MARK R
Chief Executive Officer
$329,051
@ $215.63 · 2026-05-05
STOCKDALE CAROLINE
Officer
$56,495
@ $215.63 · 2026-05-05
DYMBORT JASON E
General Counsel
$88,193
@ $215.63 · 2026-05-05
GLOECKLER MARKUS
Chief Technology Officer
$90,565
@ $215.63 · 2026-05-05
BUEHLER PATRICK JAMES
Officer
$50,673
@ $215.63 · 2026-05-05
BRADLEY ALEXANDER R.
Chief Financial Officer
$107,384
@ $215.63 · 2026-05-05
KORALEWSKI MICHAEL
Officer
$46,360
@ $215.63 · 2026-05-05
VERMA KUNTAL KUMAR
Officer
$103,287
@ $215.63 · 2026-05-05
THEURER NATHAN B
Officer
$2,803
@ $215.62 · 2026-05-05
SLOAN SAMANTHA L.
Officer
$4,097
@ $215.63 · 2026-05-05
ANTOUN GEORGES J
Officer
$122,047
@ $215.63 · 2026-05-05
VERMA KUNTAL KUMAR
Officer
$120,330
@ $210.00 · 2026-04-15
DYMBORT JASON E
General Counsel
$1.87M
@ $199.67 · 2026-03-17
BRADLEY ALEXANDER R.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $200.00 · 2026-03-17
VERMA KUNTAL KUMAR
Officer
$114,629
@ $200.40 · 2026-03-17
THEURER NATHAN B
Officer
$26,183
@ $199.87 · 2026-03-17
WIDMAR MARK R
Chief Executive Officer
$388,950
@ $200.80 · 2026-03-16
STOCKDALE CAROLINE
Officer
$67,268
@ $200.80 · 2026-03-16
GLOECKLER MARKUS
Chief Technology Officer
$73,894
@ $200.80 · 2026-03-16
BUEHLER PATRICK JAMES
Officer
$36,144
@ $200.80 · 2026-03-16
KORALEWSKI MICHAEL
Officer
$53,011
@ $200.80 · 2026-03-16
SLOAN SAMANTHA L.
Officer
$24,096
@ $200.80 · 2026-03-16
ANTOUN GEORGES J
Officer
$49,196
@ $200.80 · 2026-03-16
VERMA KUNTAL KUMAR
Officer
$79,846
@ $195.70 · 2026-03-10
THEURER NATHAN B
Officer
$63,407
@ $195.70 · 2026-03-10
WIDMAR MARK R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.05M
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
STOCKDALE CAROLINE
Officer
$198,165
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
DYMBORT JASON E
General Counsel
$248,420
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
GLOECKLER MARKUS
Chief Technology Officer
$252,227
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
BUEHLER PATRICK JAMES
Officer
$132,681
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
BRADLEY ALEXANDER R.
Chief Financial Officer
$334,272
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
KORALEWSKI MICHAEL
Officer
$143,912
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
VERMA KUNTAL KUMAR
Officer
$263,839
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
THEURER NATHAN B
Officer
$29,887
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
SLOAN SAMANTHA L.
Officer
$57,679
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
ANTOUN GEORGES J
Officer
$150,575
@ $190.36 · 2026-03-09
GLOECKLER MARKUS
Chief Technology Officer
$716,898
@ $196.95 · 2026-03-04
VERMA KUNTAL KUMAR
Officer
$143,380
@ $196.95 · 2026-03-04
THEURER NATHAN B
Officer
$18,119
@ $196.95 · 2026-03-04
WIDMAR MARK R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.52M
@ $195.93 · 2026-03-03
STOCKDALE CAROLINE
Officer
$323,284
@ $195.93 · 2026-03-03
DYMBORT JASON E
General Counsel
$641,279
@ $195.93 · 2026-03-03
GLOECKLER MARKUS
Chief Technology Officer
$671,060
@ $195.93 · 2026-03-03
BUEHLER PATRICK JAMES
Officer
$266,661
@ $195.93 · 2026-03-03
KORALEWSKI MICHAEL
Officer
$260,587
@ $195.93 · 2026-03-03
BRADLEY ALEXANDER R.
Chief Financial Officer
$625,800
@ $195.93 · 2026-03-03
VERMA KUNTAL KUMAR
Officer
$671,256
@ $195.93 · 2026-03-03
THEURER NATHAN B
Officer
$9,601
@ $195.94 · 2026-03-03
SLOAN SAMANTHA L.
Officer
$21,748
@ $195.93 · 2026-03-03
ANTOUN GEORGES J
Officer
$381,712
@ $194.95 · 2026-03-03
SWEENEY MICHAEL T
Director
$1.22M
@ $271.11 · 2025-11-06
ANTOUN GEORGES J
Officer
$9.91M
@ $265.01 · 2025-11-04
SLOAN SAMANTHA L.
Officer
$26,386
@ $188.47 · 2025-09-02
DYMBORT JASON E
General Counsel
$392,762
@ $215.33 · 2025-08-19
WIDMAR MARK R
Chief Executive Officer
$462,889
@ $199.44 · 2025-08-15
THEURER NATHAN B
General Counsel
$124,873
@ $182.03 · 2025-08-14
WIDMAR MARK R
Chief Executive Officer
$5.15M
@ $185.71 · 2025-08-13
BUEHLER PATRICK JAMES
Officer
$288,000
@ $180.00 · 2025-07-03
BUEHLER PATRICK JAMES
Officer
$278,481
@ $149.08 · 2025-06-03
KORALEWSKI MICHAEL
Officer
$466,878
@ $158.21 · 2025-06-02
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
FSLR
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
FSLR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView FSLR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs FSLR

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or First Solar, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, FSLR trades at a 76.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1097 vs. price $258), compared to BRK-B's 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $644 vs. $489).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or First Solar, Inc.?

FSLR scores 45/100 (Narrow moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. FSLR scores 6.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or First Solar, Inc.?

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 5.8% free cash flow yield, compared to First Solar, Inc.'s 4.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or First Solar, Inc.?

FSLR earns 13.5% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.