Compare StocksBRK-B vs FIX

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. FIX is overvalued at $1967, with an intrinsic value of $1567 and a margin of safety of -26%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
$1967.41

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
FIX
  • Comfort Systems USA, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Comfort Systems USA, Inc. scores 82/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 59.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
FIX
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 56.8x is 125% above the historical average of 25.2x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
FIX
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$1.10B
5.80%
FCF Yield
1.59%
14.58
Trailing P/E
56.81
22.79
Forward P/E
36.81
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
64.95%
10.50%
ROE
53.29%
27.78%
Gross Margin
25.13%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.93
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.35
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.13
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.13%
BRK-B: 7Ties: 1FIX: 4
BRK-BFIX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

FIX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
FIX
$16.63
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.73B
Δ Market Cap
+$28.72B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
FIX
25.6% Overvalued
Price is 25.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $1967.41
Fair Value: $1566.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

FIX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1967?

+24.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +23.4%

The market implies +24.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +23.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
FIX
82/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
FIX
-2.40
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
FIX
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 96.5%Retail & Other 2.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,641
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
FIX
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
FIX
7
Sells (3M)
32
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $153.27M
HARDY RHOMAN J
Director
$649,827
@ $1900.08 · 2026-05-27
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$9.81M
@ $1962.73 · 2026-05-11
SHAEFF JULIE S
Officer
$2.25M
@ $2000.37 · 2026-05-11
MYERS FRANKLIN
Director
$8.56M
@ $1902.57 · 2026-05-07
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$21.89M
@ $1969.84 · 2026-05-05
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$889,890
@ $1779.78 · 2026-04-30
SANDBROOK WILLIAM J
Director
$2.60M
@ $1732.67 · 2026-04-29
SHAEFF JULIE S
Officer
$3.16M
@ $1382.15 · 2026-03-03
REED TERRENCE M
Officer
$2.54M
@ $1419.80 · 2026-03-03
ANDERSON DARCY G
Director
$6.16M
@ $1369.74 · 2026-03-03
MYERS FRANKLIN
Director
$12.72M
@ $1472.56 · 2026-02-25
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$13.61M
@ $1453.12 · 2026-02-25
SANDBROOK WILLIAM J
Director
$3.61M
@ $1443.32 · 2026-02-24
SKIDMORE CONSTANCE ELLEN
Director
$1.43M
@ $1425.00 · 2026-02-24
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$12.91M
@ $1434.97 · 2026-02-23
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$702,500
@ $1405.00 · 2026-02-23
HOWELL LAURA FINLEY
General Counsel
$996,163
@ $996.16 · 2025-12-04
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$4.19M
@ $958.88 · 2025-12-01
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.79M
@ $947.98 · 2025-11-24
ANDERSON DARCY G
Director
$3.83M
@ $958.72 · 2025-10-31
MYERS FRANKLIN
Director
$5.03M
@ $1006.68 · 2025-10-29
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$2.51M
@ $1005.41 · 2025-10-29
BULLS HERMAN E
Director
$2.03M
@ $1013.62 · 2025-10-29
SANDBROOK WILLIAM J
Director
$1.08M
@ $721.89 · 2025-09-10
BULLS HERMAN E
Director
$2.13M
@ $710.00 · 2025-08-27
SANDBROOK WILLIAM J
Director
$482,702
@ $689.57 · 2025-08-25
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$750,159
@ $695.88 · 2025-08-22
SHAEFF JULIE S
Officer
$964,460
@ $704.50 · 2025-08-12
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$5.84M
@ $692.60 · 2025-08-08
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.92M
@ $691.74 · 2025-08-07
MYERS FRANKLIN
Chairman of the Board
$3.08M
@ $683.57 · 2025-08-06
MCKENNA TRENT TIMOTHY
Chief Operating Officer
$3.15M
@ $716.63 · 2025-07-31
BULLS HERMAN E
Director
$1.25M
@ $500.01 · 2025-06-09
ANDERSON DARCY G
Director
$4.05M
@ $506.82 · 2025-06-06
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$5.88M
@ $470.11 · 2025-05-13
SKIDMORE CONSTANCE ELLEN
Director
$452,980
@ $452.98 · 2025-05-12
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.47M
@ $431.66 · 2025-05-07
ANDERSON DARCY G
Director
$1.29M
@ $431.66 · 2025-05-07
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$784,980
@ $436.10 · 2025-05-05
MCKENNA TRENT TIMOTHY
Chief Operating Officer
$1.94M
@ $484.81 · 2024-11-22
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.73M
@ $448.88 · 2024-11-13
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$2.50M
@ $459.72 · 2024-11-08
MERCADO PABLO G
Director
$1.02M
@ $409.46 · 2024-11-05
MYERS FRANKLIN
Chairman of the Board
$4.68M
@ $390.18 · 2024-10-30
SHAEFF JULIE S
Officer
$814,881
@ $351.85 · 2024-08-29
ANDERSON DARCY G
Director
$1.19M
@ $336.19 · 2024-08-27
GEORGE WILLIAMIII
Chief Financial Officer
$1.94M
@ $332.16 · 2024-08-20
LANE BRIAN E
Chief Executive Officer
$4.94M
@ $329.55 · 2024-08-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
FIX
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
FIX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView FIX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs FIX

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Comfort Systems USA, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to FIX's -25.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $1567 vs. $1967).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Comfort Systems USA, Inc.?

FIX scores 82/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. FIX scores 7.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Comfort Systems USA, Inc.?

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 5.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Comfort Systems USA, Inc.?

FIX earns 65.0% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.