Compare StocksBRK-B vs F

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Ford Motor Company (F): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. F is overvalued at $14, with an intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
F
Ford Motor Company
$14.06

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
F

    Risks

    BRK-B
    • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    F
    • ROIC has declined by 6.4 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 7.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • PEG ratio of 8.48 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    F
    Valuation
    $61.23B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-2.25B
    5.80%
    FCF Yield
    -4.01%
    14.56
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    22.79
    Forward P/E
    7.66
    Quality & Moat
    4.96%
    ROIC
    4.37%
    10.50%
    ROE
    -14.81%
    27.78%
    Gross Margin
    7.06%
    10.06
    PEG Ratio
    8.48
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    3.67
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -2.28
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    18.18
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    4.16%
    BRK-B: 7Ties: 1F: 3
    BRK-BF

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BRK-B

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    F

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    $1.66
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $252.19B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$417.89B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    F
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-9.06B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$5.81B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    24.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $489.46
    Fair Value: $643.73
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    F
    19.0% Overvalued
    Price is 19.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $14.06
    Fair Value: $11.82
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BRK-B

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

    +0.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +1.6%

    The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    F

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    40/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    F
    35/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    -2.41
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    F
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,905
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    F
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.5%Retail & Other 32.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,169
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $250,545
    O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
    General Counsel
    $250,545
    @ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    F
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.03M
    FORD WILLIAM CLAY JR
    Officer and Director
    $1.93M
    @ $13.82 · 2026-02-19
    THORNTON JOHN L
    Director
    $99,189
    @ $13.19 · 2025-11-14
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    F
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $675,000
    FRICK ANDREW
    Officer
    $675,000
    @ $11.25 · 2025-07-02
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    F
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(40/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BRK-B
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    F
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
    View BRK-B Full AnalysisView F Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs F

    Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Ford Motor Company more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to F's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $14).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Ford Motor Company?

    BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat), while F scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Ford Motor Company in financial distress?

    F's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Ford Motor Company?

    Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 5.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Ford Motor Company's -4.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Ford Motor Company?

    BRK-B earns 5.0% ROIC versus F's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.