SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs EPAM

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$481.48
VS
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
$135.67

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.66 of market value — management is creating shareholder value.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
EPAM
  • ★EPAM Systems, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★EPAM Systems, Inc. scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 17.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • ⚠Berkshire Hathaway Inc. scores only 16/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 15.5x is 75% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
EPAM
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.04 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
EPAM
Valuation
$36.80B
Free Cash Flow
$725.31M
3.54%
FCF Yield
9.68%
15.50
Trailing P/E
20.19
22.11
Forward P/E
9.73
Quality & Moat
11.31%
ROIC
13.38%
9.30%
ROE
10.27%
26.15%
Gross Margin
28.88%
N/A
PEG Ratio
2.04
Balance Sheet Safety
0.19
Debt / Equity
0.04
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.63
N/A
Dividend Yield
N/A
BRK-B: 3Ties: 1EPAM: 6
BRK-BEPAM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

EPAM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EPAM
$-6.22
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.25B
Δ Market Cap
$-7.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $481.48
Fair Value: $699.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EPAM
24.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $135.67
Fair Value: $179.63
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $481?

+0.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.8%

The market implies +0.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

EPAM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $136?

+5.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -3.8%

The market implies +5.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -3.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
16/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
EPAM
78/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EPAM
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.5%
No. of Institutional Holders5,852
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EPAM
Insiders 3.7%Institutions 111.0%
No. of Institutional Holders861
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EPAM
0
Buys (3M)
6
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $74,998
SHNAYDER BORIS
Officer
$15,000
@ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
SOLOMON LAWRENCE F
Officer
$15,000
@ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
ABRAHAMS GARY C
Officer
$15,000
@ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
DVORKIN VIKTAR
Officer
$15,000
@ $135.14 · 2025-10-31
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$7,499
@ $133.91 · 2025-04-30
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$7,499
@ $133.91 · 2025-04-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EPAM
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $6.34M
SHNAYDER BORIS
Officer
$1.03M
@ $207.00 · 2025-12-10
ABRAHAMS GARY C
Officer
$107,574
@ $179.29 · 2025-11-17
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$227,058
@ $150.27 · 2025-10-21
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$1.52M
@ $150.86 · 2025-10-02
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$1.52M
@ $150.86 · 2025-10-02
SHNAYDER BORIS
Officer
$1.93M
@ $183.97 · 2025-05-22
YEZHKOV SERGEY
Officer
$3.58M
@ $199.07 · 2025-03-05
FEJES BALAZS
Officer
$1.08M
@ $200.00 · 2025-03-04
PETERSON JASON D
Chief Financial Officer
$277,046
@ $257.00 · 2025-01-27
PETERSON JASON D
Chief Financial Officer
$119,248
@ $257.00 · 2024-12-11
DVORKIN VIKTAR
Officer
$1.73M
@ $256.53 · 2024-12-11
PETERSON JASON D
Chief Financial Officer
$237,000
@ $237.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EPAM
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
EPAM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView EPAM Full Analysis