Compare StocksBRK-B vs DVA

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs DaVita Inc. (DVA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. DVA is undervalued at $208, with an intrinsic value of $287 and a margin of safety of 27%. Of the two, DVA has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
DVA
DaVita Inc.
$207.91

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
DVA
  • DaVita Inc. scores 75/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 10.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 3 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
DVA
  • Trailing P/E of 20.0x is 57% above the historical average of 12.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • High leverage (11.98x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
DVA
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$1.31B
5.80%
FCF Yield
9.82%
14.56
Trailing P/E
20.01
22.79
Forward P/E
12.10
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
10.62%
10.50%
ROE
80.98%
27.78%
Gross Margin
32.45%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.65
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
11.98
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.50
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BRK-B: 4Ties: 1DVA: 7
BRK-BDVA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

DVA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DVA
$0.44
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$2.37B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.04B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DVA
27.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 27.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $207.91
Fair Value: $286.62
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

DVA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $208?

+12.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.5%

The market implies +12.9% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +7.5%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DVA
75/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DVA
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DVA
Insiders 50.3%Institutions 52.6%
No. of Institutional Holders821
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DVA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DVA
4
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $17.62M
HEARTY JAMES O
Officer
$2.91M
@ $193.98 · 2026-05-15
MAUGHAN DAVID PAUL
Officer
$4.09M
@ $199.22 · 2026-05-12
ACKERMAN JOEL
Chief Financial Officer
$9.89M
@ $192.10 · 2026-05-07
HEARTY JAMES O
Officer
$381,916
@ $174.87 · 2026-05-06
HEARTY JAMES O
Officer
$352,650
@ $150.00 · 2025-07-23
RODRIGUEZ JAVIER J
Chief Executive Officer
$9.86M
@ $164.69 · 2024-09-16
ACKERMAN JOEL
Chief Financial Officer
$10.66M
@ $155.06 · 2024-08-28
RODRIGUEZ JAVIER J
Chief Executive Officer
$6.26M
@ $155.93 · 2024-08-27
STAFFIERI MICHAEL DAVID
Officer
$6.32M
@ $150.13 · 2024-08-16
WATERS KATHLEEN ALYCE
Officer
$1.15M
@ $146.21 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DVA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
DVA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView DVA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs DVA

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or DaVita Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, DVA trades at a 27.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $287 vs. price $208), compared to BRK-B's 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $644 vs. $489).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or DaVita Inc.?

DVA scores 75/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is DaVita Inc. in financial distress?

DVA's Altman Z-Score of 1.5 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or DaVita Inc.?

DaVita Inc. (DVA) generates a 9.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s 5.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or DaVita Inc.?

DVA earns 10.6% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.