Compare StocksBRK-B vs DLR

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BRK-B is fairly valued at $520, with a DCF intrinsic value of $590 and a margin of safety of 12%. DLR is overvalued at $181, with an intrinsic value of $5 and a margin of safety of -3565%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$519.80
VS
DLR
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
$181.07

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -1.8x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
DLR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 13.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 88.3x is 68% below the historical average of 272.6x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 6.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
DLR
  • Share count has increased by 18% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • FCF yield of 5.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 11.57 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
DLR
Valuation
$71.98B
Free Cash Flow
$3.77B
6.47%
FCF Yield
5.51%
13.07
Trailing P/E
88.33
23.42
Forward P/E
62.63
Quality & Moat
11.26%
ROIC
2.78%
12.12%
ROE
2.91%
30.33%
Gross Margin
56.99%
10.06
PEG Ratio
11.57
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.61
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.81
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.66
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.70%
BRK-B: 9Ties: 1DLR: 2
BRK-BDLR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

DLR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.64
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$414.76B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
DLR
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-2.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$23.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
11.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 11.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $519.80
Fair Value: $589.58
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
DLR
3564.8% Overvalued
Price is 3564.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $181.07
Fair Value: $4.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $520?

+1.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.9%

The market implies +1.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +0.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

DLR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $181?

+24.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.6%

The market implies +24.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
DLR
59/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
DLR
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.9%Retail & Other 32.8%
No. of Institutional Holders5,947
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
DLR
Insiders 0.0%Institutions 105.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,857
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $500,617
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,072
@ $512.44 · 2026-08-12
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
DLR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
DLR
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $694,604
PATTERSON MARK R
Director
$38,792
@ $193.96 · 2026-08-27
PREUSSE MARY HOGAN
Director
$655,812
@ $157.42 · 2025-12-01
POWER ANDREW P
Chief Executive Officer
$10.16M
@ $175.16 · 2025-09-15
PATTERSON MARK R
Director
$30,888
@ $176.50 · 2025-06-05
MERCIER MATT
Chief Financial Officer
$471,873
@ $187.40 · 2024-12-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
DLR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
DLR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView DLR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs DLR

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Digital Realty Trust, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 11.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $590 vs. price $520), compared to DLR's -3564.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $5 vs. $181).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Digital Realty Trust, Inc.?

DLR scores 59/100 (Narrow moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Digital Realty Trust, Inc. in financial distress?

DLR's Altman Z-Score of 1.5 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Digital Realty Trust, Inc.?

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 6.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Digital Realty Trust, Inc.'s 5.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Digital Realty Trust, Inc.?

BRK-B earns 11.3% ROIC versus DLR's 2.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.