Compare StocksBRK-B vs CSGP

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. CSGP is overvalued at $30, with an intrinsic value of $1 and a margin of safety of -1979%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
$30.12

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
CSGP
  • Gross margin of 78.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 430.3x is 54% below the historical average of 937.7x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 0.12 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
CSGP
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 52.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
CSGP
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$202.20M
5.80%
FCF Yield
1.64%
14.56
Trailing P/E
430.29
22.79
Forward P/E
16.75
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
0.10%
10.50%
ROE
0.30%
27.78%
Gross Margin
78.63%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.12
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.22
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BRK-B: 7Ties: 1CSGP: 4
BRK-BCSGP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CSGP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CSGP
$-6.39
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$521.0M
Δ Market Cap
$-3.33B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CSGP
1978.8% Overvalued
Price is 1978.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $30.12
Fair Value: $1.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

CSGP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $30?

+60.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +22.8%

The market implies +60.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +22.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CSGP
37/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CSGP
-2.07
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CSGP
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 104.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,167
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CSGP
1
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.99M
FLORANCE ANDREW COLDEN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.51M
@ $35.20 · 2026-05-01
SAMS LOUISE S.
Director
$48,360
@ $48.36 · 2026-03-06
GLASER RACHEL C
Director
$44,940
@ $44.94 · 2026-03-02
SAINT FREDERICK G
Officer
$906,600
@ $45.33 · 2026-03-02
FLORANCE ANDREW COLDEN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.48M
@ $44.52 · 2026-02-27
FLORANCE ANDREW COLDEN
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $74.67 · 2024-10-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CSGP
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.06M
CANN CYNTHIA CAMMETT
Officer
$126,642
@ $68.79 · 2025-11-13
HILL JOHN W
Director
$154,530
@ $68.68 · 2025-11-13
SAINT FREDERICK G
Officer
$2.26M
@ $90.33 · 2025-08-28
CANN CYNTHIA CAMMETT
Officer
$188,764
@ $92.85 · 2025-07-28
SAINT FREDERICK G
Officer
$2.33M
@ $93.23 · 2025-07-28
SAINT FREDERICK G
Officer
$2.03M
@ $81.10 · 2025-06-11
CANN CYNTHIA CAMMETT
Officer
$334,259
@ $78.48 · 2025-03-10
HILL JOHN W
Director
$209,939
@ $76.76 · 2024-12-10
NASSETTA CHRISTOPHER J
Director
$135,136
@ $80.39 · 2024-11-27
DESMARAIS MICHAEL J
Officer
$439,340
@ $79.88 · 2024-11-26
KLEIN MICHAEL R
Director
$5.35M
@ $74.69 · 2024-10-25
HILL JOHN W
Director
$103,562
@ $78.16 · 2024-07-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CSGP
FearGreed
😨Fear(30/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
CSGP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView CSGP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs CSGP

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or CoStar Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to CSGP's -1978.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $1 vs. $30).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or CoStar Group, Inc.?

BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat), while CSGP scores 37/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CSGP scores 8.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or CoStar Group, Inc.?

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) generates a 5.8% free cash flow yield, compared to CoStar Group, Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or CoStar Group, Inc.?

BRK-B earns 5.0% ROIC versus CSGP's 0.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.