Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs COF

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Capital One Financial Corporation (COF): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, BRK-B is fairly valued at $542, with a DCF intrinsic value of $590 and a margin of safety of 8%. COF is undervalued at $205, with an intrinsic value of $261 and a margin of safety of 21%. Of the two, COF has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$542.49
VS
COF
Capital One Financial Corporation
$204.85

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -1.8x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
COF
  • ★Capital One Financial Corporation scores 75/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 26.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 12.6x is 45% below the historical average of 22.9x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BRK-B
  • ⚠FCF yield of 6.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
COF
  • ⚠Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 64% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
COF
Valuation
$71.98B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
6.20%
FCF Yield
N/A
13.64
Trailing P/E
12.55
24.18
Forward P/E
8.55
Quality & Moat
11.26%
ROIC
29.36%
12.12%
ROE
9.39%
30.33%
Gross Margin
0.00%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.18
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-1.81
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.56%
BRK-B: 2Ties: 1COF: 5
BRK-BCOF

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

COF

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.64
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$414.76B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
COF
$14.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$8.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$116.05B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
8.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 8.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $542.49
Fair Value: $589.58
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
COF
21.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 21.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $204.85
Fair Value: $260.76
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $542?

+2.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +2.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

COF

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
COF
75/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
COF
-2.27
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.0%Retail & Other 32.7%
No. of Institutional Holders5,930
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
COF
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 90.9%Retail & Other 7.8%
No. of Institutional Holders2,696
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $500,617
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,072
@ $512.44 · 2026-08-12
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
COF
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
ZAMSKY MICHAEL
Officer
$1,972
@ $197.20 · 2025-05-16
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
COF
14
Sells (3M)
43
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $85.47M
FAIRBANK RICHARD D
Chief Executive Officer
$18.41M
@ $202.86 · 2026-10-27
KARAM CELIA EDWARDS
Officer
$377,422
@ $195.86 · 2026-10-15
DEAN LIA
Officer
$369,588
@ $195.86 · 2026-10-15
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$686,770
@ $196.22 · 2026-10-06
DEAN LIA
Officer
$425,741
@ $206.07 · 2026-09-15
KARAM CELIA EDWARDS
Officer
$415,643
@ $206.07 · 2026-09-15
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$749,350
@ $214.10 · 2026-09-01
DEAN LIA
Officer
$494,566
@ $225.52 · 2026-08-17
KARAM CELIA EDWARDS
Officer
$425,782
@ $225.52 · 2026-08-17
MOUADEB MARK DANIEL
Officer
$269,775
@ $225.00 · 2026-08-13
ZAMSKY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.19M
@ $218.02 · 2026-08-10
RAGHU RAVI
Officer
$10,924
@ $218.48 · 2026-08-07
MOUADEB MARK DANIEL
Officer
$260,260
@ $220.00 · 2026-08-04
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$767,655
@ $219.33 · 2026-08-04
MOUADEB MARK DANIEL
Officer
$148,350
@ $215.00 · 2026-08-03
RAGHU RAVI
Officer
$2.04M
@ $209.78 · 2026-07-31
GOLDEN TIMOTHY P.
Officer
$735,757
@ $211.00 · 2026-07-29
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$728,000
@ $208.00 · 2026-07-07
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$641,760
@ $183.36 · 2026-06-02
HAGGERTY KAITLIN
Officer
$262,125
@ $183.82 · 2026-05-13
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$643,755
@ $183.93 · 2026-05-12
KARAM CELIA EDWARDS
Officer
$336,822
@ $192.58 · 2026-05-01
KARAM CELIA EDWARDS
Officer
$203,985
@ $185.61 · 2026-04-01
DEAN LIA
Officer
$314,052
@ $185.61 · 2026-04-01
KARAM CELIA EDWARDS
Officer
$312,476
@ $191.00 · 2026-03-02
DEAN LIA
Officer
$627,244
@ $191.00 · 2026-03-02
MOUADEB MARK DANIEL
Officer
$334,530
@ $210.00 · 2026-02-26
MOUADEB MARK DANIEL
Officer
$305,755
@ $202.62 · 2026-02-25
HANSON JASON P
Officer
$764,445
@ $205.00 · 2026-02-25
BLINDE NEAL A
Officer
$7.27M
@ $190.51 · 2026-02-24
DEAN LIA
Officer
$734,565
@ $223.68 · 2026-02-04
KARAM CELIA EDWARDS
Officer
$460,071
@ $218.25 · 2026-02-02
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$500,000
@ $250.00 · 2026-01-06
RAGHU RAVI
Officer
$3.36M
@ $250.00 · 2026-01-05
KARAM CELIA EDWARDS
Officer
$504,338
@ $244.35 · 2026-01-02
DEAN LIA
Officer
$772,879
@ $244.35 · 2026-01-02
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$443,080
@ $221.54 · 2025-12-02
DEAN LIA
Officer
$713,132
@ $218.15 · 2025-12-01
KARAM CELIA EDWARDS
Officer
$640,488
@ $218.15 · 2025-12-01
LAPRADE FRANK G. III
Officer
$3.96M
@ $222.03 · 2025-11-13
BLINDE NEAL A
Officer
$9.58M
@ $221.83 · 2025-11-06
FAIRBANK RICHARD D
Chief Executive Officer
$22.84M
@ $220.68 · 2025-11-04
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$438,820
@ $219.41 · 2025-11-04
FAIRBANK RICHARD D
Chief Executive Officer
$23.35M
@ $225.68 · 2025-10-27
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$423,980
@ $211.99 · 2025-10-02
COOPER MATTHEW W.
General Counsel
$446,800
@ $223.40 · 2025-09-02
GOLDEN TIMOTHY P.
Officer
$44,590
@ $215.41 · 2025-08-19
GOLDEN TIMOTHY P.
Officer
$727,989
@ $210.28 · 2025-08-12
ZAMSKY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.16M
@ $209.59 · 2025-08-04
ALEXANDER ROBERT M.
Chief Technology Officer
$2.30M
@ $227.86 · 2025-07-23
HACKETT ANN FRITZ
Director
$329,445
@ $198.70 · 2025-05-12
ZAMSKY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.91M
@ $199.40 · 2025-05-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
COF
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
COF
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView COF Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs COF

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Capital One Financial Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, COF trades at a 21.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $261 vs. price $205), compared to BRK-B's 8.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $590 vs. $542).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Capital One Financial Corporation?▼

COF scores 75/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Capital One Financial Corporation in financial distress?▼

COF's Altman Z-Score of 0.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Capital One Financial Corporation?▼

COF earns 29.4% ROIC versus BRK-B's 11.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

BRK-B vs COF: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io