SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › BRK-B vs CI

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs The Cigna Group (CI)

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$473.01
VS
CI
The Cigna Group
$282.90

Rewards

BRK-B
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.13 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
CI
  • ★The Cigna Group scores 85/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Dividend yield of 2.21% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Risks

BRK-B
  • ⚠FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 15.2x is 72% above the historical average of 8.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
CI
  • ⚠Gross margin of 9.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
CI
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
$6.92B
6.00%
FCF Yield
9.25%
15.24
Trailing P/E
11.99
21.95
Forward P/E
8.44
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
16.40%
9.18%
ROE
14.04%
27.78%
Gross Margin
9.15%
0.13
PEG Ratio
0.41
Balance Sheet Safety
0.18
Debt / Equity
0.73
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.72
N/A
Dividend Yield
2.21%
BRK-B: 5Ties: 1CI: 5
BRK-BCI

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

CI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CI
$-2.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$9.93B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.45B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
31.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $473.01
Fair Value: $685.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CI
40.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 40.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $282.90
Fair Value: $474.76
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $473?

-0.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.0%

The market implies -0.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

CI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $283?

+5.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.0%

The market implies +5.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
CI
85/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CI
-2.49
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 66.2%Retail & Other 33.6%
No. of Institutional Holders5,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CI
Insiders 1.4%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 6.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,181
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CI
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $999,916
CORDANI DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$999,916
@ $241.88 · 2025-11-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CI
2
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.33M
JONES NICOLE S.
Officer
$666,515
@ $288.91 · 2026-03-02
NEVILLE EVERETT
Officer
$496,636
@ $288.91 · 2026-03-02
EVANKO BRIAN C
President
$1.61M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-03
JONES NICOLE S.
General Counsel
$8.56M
@ $300.00 · 2025-08-15
GRANGER ELDER
Director
$737,392
@ $310.35 · 2025-03-14
EDER NOELLE K
Officer
$3.18M
@ $320.00 · 2025-03-07
JONES NICOLE S.
Officer
$1.51M
@ $308.12 · 2025-03-03
CORDANI DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$8.17M
@ $308.12 · 2025-03-03
DELANEY WILLIAM J.
Director
$922,152
@ $342.68 · 2024-08-19
JONES NICOLE S.
General Counsel
$7.29M
@ $330.96 · 2024-08-12
TRIPLETT MICHAEL W
Officer
$2.25M
@ $329.94 · 2024-08-12
EVANKO BRIAN C
Officer
$1.65M
@ $345.01 · 2024-06-24
GRANGER ELDER
Director
$181,265
@ $331.38 · 2024-06-17
GRANGER ELDER
Director
$338,080
@ $338.08 · 2024-06-12
AGOGLIA HOELTZEL MARY T
Officer
$2.07M
@ $348.71 · 2024-05-14
EDER NOELLE K
Officer
$3.73M
@ $348.47 · 2024-05-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CI
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
CI
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView CI Full Analysis