Compare StocksBRK-B vs C

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Citigroup Inc. (C): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. C is undervalued at $143, with an intrinsic value of $419 and a margin of safety of 66%. Of the two, C has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
C
Citigroup Inc.
$143.06

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
C
  • Citigroup Inc. scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • PEG ratio of 0.79 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
C
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Trailing P/E of 17.7x is 50% above the historical average of 11.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
C
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
5.80%
FCF Yield
N/A
14.56
Trailing P/E
17.68
22.79
Forward P/E
11.42
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
2.60%
10.50%
ROE
7.65%
27.78%
Gross Margin
0.00%
10.06
PEG Ratio
0.79
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.68%
BRK-B: 4Ties: 1C: 3
BRK-BC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

C

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
C
$5.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.43B
Δ Market Cap
+$116.31B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
C
65.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 65.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $143.06
Fair Value: $418.88
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

C

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
C
83/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
C
-2.11
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
C
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 81.6%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,188
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
C
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
C
3
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.83M
DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM
Director
$265,260
@ $125.30 · 2026-05-08
GILES NICOLE M.
Officer
$1.68M
@ $131.80 · 2026-04-15
SKYLER EDWARD
Officer
$3.29M
@ $131.41 · 2026-04-15
MASON MARK A.L.
Chief Financial Officer
$416,045
@ $114.71 · 2026-02-20
LUCHETTI GONZALO
Officer
$2.30M
@ $115.03 · 2026-02-12
HABNER PAMELA
Officer
$3.49M
@ $117.26 · 2026-02-12
GILES NICOLE M.
Officer
$2.00M
@ $119.04 · 2026-02-11
GARG SUNIL
Officer
$2.13M
@ $118.49 · 2026-02-11
HENRY PETER B
Director
$271,209
@ $90.40 · 2025-07-16
DUGAN JOHN CUNNINGHAM
Director
$301,493
@ $68.26 · 2025-04-30
SKYLER EDWARD
Officer
$2.93M
@ $82.41 · 2025-02-14
MASON MARK A.L.
Chief Financial Officer
$4.86M
@ $83.21 · 2025-02-14
WECHTER SARA
Officer
$1.23M
@ $81.01 · 2025-02-13
SELVAKESARI ANAND
Chief Operating Officer
$2.43M
@ $81.10 · 2025-02-13
MCINTOSH BRENT
Officer
$1.62M
@ $81.22 · 2025-02-13
LUCHETTI GONZALO
Officer
$1.33M
@ $81.36 · 2025-02-13
KHALIQ SYED SHAHMIR
Officer
$2.45M
@ $81.70 · 2025-02-13
HENRY PETER B
Director
$909,675
@ $69.97 · 2024-11-11
LUCHETTI GONZALO
Officer
$816,314
@ $61.59 · 2024-08-20
OKPARA JOHNBULL
Officer
$1.53M
@ $60.57 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
C
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
C
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView C Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs C

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Citigroup Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, C trades at a 65.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $419 vs. price $143), compared to BRK-B's 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $644 vs. $489).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Citigroup Inc.?

C scores 83/100 (Wide moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Citigroup Inc. in financial distress?

C's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BRK-B scores 2.5 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Citigroup Inc.?

BRK-B earns 5.0% ROIC versus C's 2.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.