Compare StocksBRK-B vs BX

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) vs Blackstone Inc. (BX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BRK-B is undervalued at $489, with a DCF intrinsic value of $644 and a margin of safety of 24%. BX is fairly valued at $124, with an intrinsic value of $148 and a margin of safety of 16%. Of the two, BRK-B has the wider margin of safety.

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$489.46
VS
BX
Blackstone Inc.
$123.79

Rewards

BRK-B
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.3x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
BX
  • Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Trailing P/E of 31.7x is 33% below the historical average of 47.5x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BRK-B
  • FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 10.06 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
BX
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — share issuance is offsetting repurchases.
  • PEG ratio of 2.15 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.3% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BRK-B
BX
Valuation
$61.23B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
5.80%
FCF Yield
N/A
14.56
Trailing P/E
31.74
22.79
Forward P/E
16.43
Quality & Moat
4.96%
ROIC
11.74%
10.50%
ROE
29.53%
27.78%
Gross Margin
100.00%
10.06
PEG Ratio
2.15
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.60
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.28
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
3.89%
BRK-B: 2Ties: 1BX: 6
BRK-BBX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BRK-B

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

BX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BRK-B
$1.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$252.19B
Δ Market Cap
+$417.89B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
BX
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-7.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$65.62B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BRK-B
24.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 24.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $489.46
Fair Value: $643.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
BX
16.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 16.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $123.79
Fair Value: $148.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BRK-B

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $489?

+0.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.6%

The market implies +0.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

BX

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BRK-B
40/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
BX
63/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BRK-B
-2.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
BX
-2.52
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BRK-B
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 67.3%Retail & Other 32.4%
No. of Institutional Holders5,905
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
BX
Insiders 1.1%Institutions 73.7%Retail & Other 25.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,680
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $250,545
O'SULLIVAN MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$250,545
@ $467.43 · 2026-05-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
BX
1
Buys (3M)
6
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.22M
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$53,974
@ $123.23 · 2026-05-11
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$68,553
@ $130.83 · 2026-02-17
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$58,835
@ $146.36 · 2025-11-10
BREYER JAMES W
Director
$2.00M
@ $143.86 · 2025-11-04
BREYER JAMES W
Director
$1.99M
@ $151.23 · 2025-10-29
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$46,699
@ $170.43 · 2025-08-11
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$40,342
@ $136.75 · 2025-05-05
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$61,926
@ $165.14 · 2025-02-18
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$36,799
@ $169.58 · 2024-11-04
PORAT RUTH M
Director
$34,868
@ $130.10 · 2024-08-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BRK-B
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
BX
1
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $54.48M
SAWHNEY VIKRANT
Officer
$3.78M
@ $125.79 · 2026-05-01
BARATTA JOSEPH P
Director
$19.85M
@ $175.69 · 2025-09-25
FINLEY JOHN G
Officer
$3.69M
@ $171.46 · 2025-09-08
SAWHNEY VIKRANT
Officer
$8.83M
@ $173.64 · 2025-08-14
PAYNE DAVID
Officer
$1.60M
@ $169.97 · 2025-08-07
BARATTA JOSEPH P
Director
$16.74M
@ $167.36 · 2025-08-05
FINLEY JOHN G
Officer
$3.46M
@ $138.47 · 2025-05-08
FINLEY JOHN G
Officer
$7.43M
@ $175.94 · 2024-11-07
BARATTA JOSEPH P
Director
$17.56M
@ $150.81 · 2024-10-01
FINLEY JOHN G
Officer
$4.61M
@ $131.74 · 2024-08-07
PAYNE DAVID
Officer
$1.28M
@ $141.93 · 2024-07-31
BARATTA JOSEPH P
Director
$702,668
@ $140.90 · 2024-07-30
BARATTA JOSEPH P
Director
$14.32M
@ $123.00 · 2024-07-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BRK-B
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
BX
FearGreed
😨Fear(40/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BRK-B
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
BX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
View BRK-B Full AnalysisView BX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BRK-B vs BX

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Blackstone Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BRK-B trades at a 24.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $644 vs. price $489), compared to BX's 16.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $148 vs. $124).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Blackstone Inc.?

BX scores 63/100 (Narrow moat), while BRK-B scores 40/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in financial distress?

BRK-B's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BX scores 3.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. or Blackstone Inc.?

BX earns 11.7% ROIC versus BRK-B's 5.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.