Compare StocksBR vs NOW

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) vs ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BR is undervalued at $165, with a DCF intrinsic value of $259 and a margin of safety of 36%. NOW is overvalued at $139, with an intrinsic value of $84 and a margin of safety of -66%. Of the two, BR has the wider margin of safety.

BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
$165.24
VS
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
$139.08

Rewards

BR
  • Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
NOW
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.22 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BR
  • FCF yield of 6.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 2.03 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
NOW
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BR
NOW
Valuation
$1.19B
Free Cash Flow
$5.15B
6.34%
FCF Yield
3.58%
17.19
Trailing P/E
87.47
14.27
Forward P/E
27.79
Quality & Moat
22.85%
ROIC
2.26%
40.92%
ROE
14.24%
31.78%
Gross Margin
74.77%
2.03
PEG Ratio
1.03
Balance Sheet Safety
1.10
Net Debt / Equity
0.30
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.72
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.31
2.61%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
BR: 6Ties: 1NOW: 5
BRNOW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NOW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BR
$-3.77
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.45B
Δ Market Cap
$-5.45B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NOW
$16.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.90B
Δ Market Cap
+$81.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BR
36.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 36.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $165.24
Fair Value: $259.20
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NOW
65.6% Overvalued
Price is 65.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $139.08
Fair Value: $83.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $165?

+4.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.6%

The market implies +4.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

NOW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $139?

+27.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.6%

The market implies +27.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +12.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BR
95/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NOW
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BR
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NOW
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BR
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 98.1%Retail & Other 1.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,445
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NOW
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.0%
No. of Institutional Holders3,128
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BR
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.04M
MARKUS MAURA A
Director
$9,437
@ $157.28 · 2026-03-27
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.03M
@ $194.49 · 2026-03-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NOW
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.00M
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $104.60 · 2026-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BR
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.60M
JARKOWSKI HOPE M.
Officer
$304,720
@ $154.99 · 2026-06-04
DUELKS ROBERT N
Director
$48,728
@ $192.60 · 2026-02-06
CAREY THOMAS PATRICK
Officer
$2.34M
@ $229.26 · 2025-12-03
PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
President
$900,384
@ $226.00 · 2025-11-18
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.47M
@ $258.37 · 2025-08-25
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.48M
@ $260.87 · 2025-08-18
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$35.10M
@ $260.36 · 2025-08-15
PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
President
$1.85M
@ $262.72 · 2025-08-12
DUELKS ROBERT N
Director
$122,575
@ $245.15 · 2025-06-06
DESCHUTTER DOUGLAS RICHARD
President
$1.20M
@ $245.76 · 2025-06-06
MARKUS MAURA A
Director
$864,408
@ $243.08 · 2025-06-04
DESCHUTTER DOUGLAS RICHARD
Officer
$1.21M
@ $239.55 · 2025-05-27
CARTER PAMELA LYNN
Director
$1.17M
@ $242.23 · 2025-05-20
JARKOWSKI HOPE M.
Officer
$257,615
@ $240.99 · 2025-05-15
CAREY THOMAS PATRICK
Officer
$855,798
@ $237.26 · 2025-05-13
STINGI RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$187,848
@ $234.81 · 2025-05-07
JARKOWSKI HOPE M.
Officer
$251,220
@ $235.22 · 2025-05-07
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.87M
@ $245.07 · 2025-04-02
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$22.59M
@ $235.43 · 2025-03-10
PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
President
$5.26M
@ $235.23 · 2025-03-07
DUELKS ROBERT N
Director
$1.99M
@ $237.15 · 2025-02-26
KELLER BRETT A
Director
$1.31M
@ $240.40 · 2025-02-06
MATLIN LAURA
General Counsel
$124,181
@ $241.60 · 2025-02-04
CAREY THOMAS PATRICK
Officer
$3.62M
@ $230.32 · 2024-12-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NOW
4
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.26M
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$300,777
@ $147.87 · 2026-08-31
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.08M
@ $138.00 · 2026-08-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$365,851
@ $135.50 · 2026-08-27
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$188,400
@ $125.60 · 2026-08-13
BRIGGS TERESA
Director
$173,376
@ $108.70 · 2026-05-28
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$103,238
@ $98.51 · 2026-05-18
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.48M
@ $90.14 · 2026-05-14
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$130,845
@ $87.23 · 2026-05-14
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$13,661
@ $90.47 · 2026-05-08
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$799,868
@ $89.60 · 2026-04-24
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$376,142
@ $101.77 · 2026-02-23
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.02M
@ $105.93 · 2026-02-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$147,994
@ $105.71 · 2026-02-13
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$151,755
@ $101.17 · 2026-02-12
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$352,750
@ $850.00 · 2025-12-05
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$336,936
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$242,400
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
JACKSON LAWRENCE
Director
$214,708
@ $810.22 · 2025-11-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$160,155
@ $838.51 · 2025-11-18
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$431,736
@ $827.08 · 2025-11-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$200,549
@ $839.12 · 2025-11-18
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$249,353
@ $817.55 · 2025-11-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$235,894
@ $842.48 · 2025-11-14
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$52,848
@ $852.39 · 2025-11-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$56,257
@ $852.38 · 2025-11-13
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$164,997
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$222,012
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.00M
@ $915.11 · 2025-08-29
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$5.34M
@ $916.63 · 2025-08-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$1.50M
@ $884.26 · 2025-08-20
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.30M
@ $895.32 · 2025-08-20
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $900.00 · 2025-08-19
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$1.49M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$1.53M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.35M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$238,496
@ $851.77 · 2025-08-15
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$258,000
@ $860.00 · 2025-08-14
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$72,288
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$57,658
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$256,490
@ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BR
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NOW
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
NOW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
View BR Full AnalysisView NOW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BR vs NOW

Is Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BR trades at a 36.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $259 vs. price $165), compared to NOW's -65.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $84 vs. $139).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?

BR scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while NOW scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) generates a 6.3% free cash flow yield, compared to ServiceNow, Inc.'s 3.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. or ServiceNow, Inc.?

BR earns 22.9% ROIC versus NOW's 2.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

BR vs NOW: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io