Compare StocksBR vs MS

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BR is undervalued at $138, with a DCF intrinsic value of $185 and a margin of safety of 26%. MS is undervalued at $223, with an intrinsic value of $298 and a margin of safety of 25%. Of the two, BR has the wider margin of safety.

BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
$137.60
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$223.17

Rewards

BR
  • Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 41.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
MS
  • Gross margin of 87.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BR
  • FCF yield of 7.5% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
MS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 26% above the historical average of 16.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.66 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BR
MS
Valuation
$1.19B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
7.46%
FCF Yield
N/A
14.72
Trailing P/E
20.21
13.22
Forward P/E
17.56
Quality & Moat
17.10%
ROIC
3.38%
42.31%
ROE
16.39%
31.31%
Gross Margin
87.39%
0.99
PEG Ratio
2.66
Balance Sheet Safety
1.10
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.76
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
2.73%
Dividend Yield
1.81%
BR: 6Ties: 1MS: 2
BRMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BR
$9.77
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$10.42B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BR
25.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $137.60
Fair Value: $184.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
25.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $223.17
Fair Value: $297.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $138?

+6.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.7%

The market implies +6.3% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +4.7%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BR
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BR
-2.66
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BR
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 100.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,502
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.3%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,208
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BR
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.03M
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.03M
@ $194.49 · 2026-03-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BR
1
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $43.49M
JARKOWSKI HOPE M.
Officer
$304,720
@ $154.99 · 2026-06-04
DUELKS ROBERT N
Director
$48,728
@ $192.60 · 2026-02-06
CAREY THOMAS PATRICK
Officer
$2.34M
@ $229.26 · 2025-12-03
PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
President
$900,384
@ $226.00 · 2025-11-18
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.47M
@ $258.37 · 2025-08-25
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.48M
@ $260.87 · 2025-08-18
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$35.10M
@ $260.36 · 2025-08-15
PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
President
$1.85M
@ $262.72 · 2025-08-12
DUELKS ROBERT N
Director
$122,575
@ $245.15 · 2025-06-06
DESCHUTTER DOUGLAS RICHARD
President
$1.20M
@ $245.76 · 2025-06-06
MARKUS MAURA A
Director
$864,408
@ $243.08 · 2025-06-04
DESCHUTTER DOUGLAS RICHARD
Officer
$1.21M
@ $239.55 · 2025-05-27
CARTER PAMELA LYNN
Director
$1.17M
@ $242.23 · 2025-05-20
JARKOWSKI HOPE M.
Officer
$257,615
@ $240.99 · 2025-05-15
CAREY THOMAS PATRICK
Officer
$855,798
@ $237.26 · 2025-05-13
STINGI RICHARD JOHN
Officer
$187,848
@ $234.81 · 2025-05-07
JARKOWSKI HOPE M.
Officer
$251,220
@ $235.22 · 2025-05-07
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.87M
@ $245.07 · 2025-04-02
GOKEY TIMOTHY C.
Chief Executive Officer
$22.59M
@ $235.43 · 2025-03-10
PERRY CHRISTOPHER JOHN
President
$5.26M
@ $235.23 · 2025-03-07
DUELKS ROBERT N
Director
$1.99M
@ $237.15 · 2025-02-26
KELLER BRETT A
Director
$1.31M
@ $240.40 · 2025-02-06
MATLIN LAURA
General Counsel
$124,181
@ $241.60 · 2025-02-04
CAREY THOMAS PATRICK
Officer
$3.62M
@ $230.32 · 2024-12-03
MATLIN LAURA
Officer
$1.55M
@ $227.65 · 2024-11-12
MARKUS MAURA A
Director
$880,836
@ $227.02 · 2024-11-11
CAREY THOMAS PATRICK
Officer
$2.44M
@ $226.82 · 2024-11-11
DESCHUTTER DOUGLAS RICHARD
Officer
$5.33M
@ $220.21 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.42M
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BR
FearGreed
😨Fear(29/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (29)
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
View BR Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BR vs MS

Is Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BR trades at a 25.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $185 vs. price $138), compared to MS's 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $298 vs. $223).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

BR scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BR scores 4.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

BR earns 17.1% ROIC versus MS's 3.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.'s or Morgan Stanley's?

BR's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). BR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.