Compare StocksBMY vs PFE

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BMY is fairly valued at $54, with a DCF intrinsic value of $56 and a margin of safety of 3%. PFE is overvalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -12%. Of the two, BMY has the wider margin of safety.

BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
$54.00
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$25.21

Rewards

BMY
  • Gross margin of 72.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • FCF yield of 11.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.2x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

BMY
  • PEG ratio of 177.24 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (1.79x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 13.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BMY
PFE
Valuation
$12.85B
Free Cash Flow
$12.38B
11.65%
FCF Yield
8.61%
15.13
Trailing P/E
19.24
8.76
Forward P/E
8.91
Quality & Moat
19.02%
ROIC
10.19%
38.73%
ROE
8.31%
71.98%
Gross Margin
74.80%
177.24
PEG Ratio
13.77
Balance Sheet Safety
1.79
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.89
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.03
4.51%
Dividend Yield
6.61%
BMY: 5Ties: 4PFE: 3
BMYPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BMY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BMY
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-8.52B
Δ Market Cap
$-39.49B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BMY
2.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 2.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $54.00
Fair Value: $55.52
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
12.3% Overvalued
Price is 12.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.21
Fair Value: $22.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BMY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $54?

+3.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.0%

The market implies +3.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -0.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

+5.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +5.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BMY
60/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BMY
-2.71
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BMY
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 83.8%Retail & Other 16.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,267
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 30.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,744
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BMY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HIRAWAT SAMIT
Officer
$202,215
@ $47.58 · 2025-04-25
BOERNER CHRISTOPHER S
Chief Executive Officer
$110,096
@ $55.05 · 2025-02-20
HIRAWAT SAMIT
Officer
$100,000
@ $54.85 · 2025-02-14
HIRAWAT SAMIT
Officer
$100,055
@ $54.67 · 2024-11-01
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BMY
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.52M
ELKINS DAVID VINCENT
Chief Financial Officer
$1.85M
@ $61.67 · 2026-04-01
ELKINS DAVID VINCENT
Chief Financial Officer
$2.65M
@ $47.33 · 2025-09-02
SHORT BARTIE WENDY
Officer
$16,719
@ $44.23 · 2025-08-01
HOLZER PHIL M
Officer
$38,930
@ $55.61 · 2024-11-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BMY
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BMY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View BMY Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BMY vs PFE

Is Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BMY trades at a 2.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $56 vs. price $54), compared to PFE's -12.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $25).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Pfizer Inc.?

BMY scores 60/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BMY scores 2.3 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Pfizer Inc.?

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) generates a 11.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Pfizer Inc.'s 8.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Pfizer Inc.?

BMY earns 19.0% ROIC versus PFE's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's or Pfizer Inc.'s?

BMY's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). BMY has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.