Compare StocksBLK vs QCOM

BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BLK is undervalued at $1090, with a DCF intrinsic value of $196760049429 and a margin of safety of 100%. QCOM is overvalued at $148, with an intrinsic value of $127 and a margin of safety of -16%. Of the two, BLK has the wider margin of safety.

BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
$1090.39
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$147.61

Rewards

BLK
  • BlackRock, Inc. scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.58 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BLK
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.79 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $22.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 7.0% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
QCOM
  • FCF yield of 6.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BLK
QCOM
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$10.24B
N/A
FCF Yield
6.61%
26.11
Trailing P/E
16.87
16.94
Forward P/E
14.34
Quality & Moat
9.66%
ROIC
15.03%
N/A
ROE
33.75%
47.15%
Gross Margin
54.23%
1.17
PEG Ratio
0.63
Balance Sheet Safety
0.03
Net Debt / Equity
0.25
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.16
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.58
2.10%
Dividend Yield
2.49%
BLK: 2Ties: 1QCOM: 6
BLKQCOM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BLK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BLK
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$7.94B
Δ Market Cap
+$361.71
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BLK
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $1090.39
Fair Value: $196760049428.67
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
QCOM
84.2% Overvalued
Price is 84.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $147.61
Fair Value: $80.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BLK

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $148?

+11.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +11.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BLK
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BLK
-2.22
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BLK
Insiders 1.9%Institutions 83.9%Retail & Other 14.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,999
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 15.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,722
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BLK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BLK
2
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $203.56M
FINK LAURENCE D
Chief Executive Officer
$2.06M
@ $1080.57 · 2026-07-16
MEADE CHRISTOPHER J
General Counsel
$19.94M
@ $1102.09 · 2026-07-16
FINK LAURENCE D
Chief Executive Officer
$35.61M
@ $1050.55 · 2026-04-28
KAPITO ROBERT S
President
$9.23M
@ $1056.60 · 2026-04-27
COHEN STEPHEN
Officer
$240,651
@ $1069.56 · 2026-02-23
COHEN STEPHEN
Officer
$2.34M
@ $1073.87 · 2026-02-11
GOLDSTEIN ROBERT L
Chief Operating Officer
$64.66M
@ $1087.02 · 2026-02-11
KUSHEL J RICHARD
Officer
$22.50M
@ $1125.00 · 2026-01-21
SMALL MARTIN
Chief Financial Officer
$31.68M
@ $1171.14 · 2026-01-16
SMALL MARTIN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.31M
@ $1043.38 · 2025-12-01
LORD RACHEL
Officer
$13.98M
@ $1165.04 · 2025-10-20
KUSHEL J RICHARD
Officer
$19.21M
@ $1120.50 · 2025-07-30
FINK LAURENCE D
Chief Executive Officer
$30.21M
@ $1123.69 · 2025-07-25
LORD RACHEL
Officer
$20.30M
@ $1125.60 · 2025-07-25
FREDA FABRIZIO
Director
$4.98M
@ $1122.81 · 2025-07-24
FINK LAURENCE D
Chief Executive Officer
$15.12M
@ $917.18 · 2025-04-29
KUSHEL J RICHARD
Officer
$9.13M
@ $912.50 · 2025-04-24
KUSHEL J RICHARD
Officer
$1.70M
@ $852.01 · 2025-04-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
QCOM
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BLK
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
QCOM
FearGreed
😨Fear(27/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BLK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (27)
View BLK Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BLK vs QCOM

Is BlackRock, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BLK trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $196760049429 vs. price $1090), compared to QCOM's -15.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $127 vs. $148).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, BlackRock, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while BLK scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is BlackRock, Inc. in financial distress?

BLK's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. QCOM scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, BlackRock, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QCOM earns 15.0% ROIC versus BLK's 9.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, BlackRock, Inc.'s or QUALCOMM Incorporated's?

QCOM's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to BLK's 54/100 (Borderline). QCOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.