Compare StocksBLDR vs ORCL

Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, BLDR is undervalued at $59, with a DCF intrinsic value of $421 and a margin of safety of 86%. ORCL is undervalued at $151, with an intrinsic value of $386 and a margin of safety of 61%. Of the two, BLDR has the wider margin of safety.

BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
$59.11
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$150.56

Rewards

BLDR
  • Share count has been reduced by 20% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • FCF yield of 13.4% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Market sentiment is in extreme fear territory (score: 23/100) — historically, periods of fear have often presented buying opportunities.
ORCL
  • Gross margin of 64.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BLDR
  • ROIC has declined by 27.3 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Trailing P/E of 64.3x is 331% above the historical average of 14.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (1.97x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.73 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BLDR
ORCL
Valuation
$853.28M
Free Cash Flow
$-45.85B
13.42%
FCF Yield
-10.07%
64.25
Trailing P/E
23.60
13.37
Forward P/E
13.70
Quality & Moat
4.11%
ROIC
8.55%
2.51%
ROE
41.19%
29.19%
Gross Margin
63.96%
2.02
PEG Ratio
0.80
Balance Sheet Safety
1.29
Net Debt / Equity
1.97
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.06
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.84
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.40%
BLDR: 3Ties: 2ORCL: 7
BLDRORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BLDR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BLDR
$0.78
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$3.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.37B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$5.89
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$147.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BLDR
85.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 85.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $59.11
Fair Value: $420.68
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
60.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 60.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $150.56
Fair Value: $385.54
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BLDR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $59?

+5.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.3%

The market implies +5.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +2.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BLDR
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BLDR
-2.89
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BLDR
Insiders 2.7%Institutions 101.8%
No. of Institutional Holders937
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 38.6%Institutions 43.6%Retail & Other 17.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,570
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BLDR
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.39M
LEVY PAUL S
Director
$4.39M
@ $87.73 · 2026-03-13
VANCE TODD
Officer
$224,994
@ $115.50 · 2025-06-10
CHARLES DIRKSON R
Director
$548,350
@ $109.67 · 2025-05-27
LEVY PAUL S
Director
$55.48M
@ $110.97 · 2025-05-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BLDR
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $390,850
RUSH DAVID E.
Director
$390,850
@ $78.17 · 2026-05-08
JOHNSON TIMOTHY D
General Counsel
$181,062
@ $144.85 · 2025-08-22
RUSH DAVID E.
Director
$2.53M
@ $140.82 · 2025-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
1
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $111.30M
HENLEY JEFFREY O
Officer and Director
$63.66M
@ $159.16 · 2026-06-24
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BLDR
FearGreed
😨Fear(23/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BLDR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
View BLDR Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BLDR vs ORCL

Is Builders FirstSource, Inc. or Oracle Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BLDR trades at a 85.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $421 vs. price $59), compared to ORCL's 60.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $386 vs. $151).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Builders FirstSource, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while BLDR scores 46/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Oracle Corporation in financial distress?

ORCL's Altman Z-Score of 1.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BLDR scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Builders FirstSource, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) generates a 13.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Oracle Corporation's -10.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Builders FirstSource, Inc. or Oracle Corporation?

ORCL earns 8.5% ROIC versus BLDR's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

BLDR vs ORCL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io