Compare StocksBKR vs INTU

Baker Hughes Company (BKR) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, BKR is undervalued at $58, with a DCF intrinsic value of $103 and a margin of safety of 44%. INTU is undervalued at $267, with an intrinsic value of $536 and a margin of safety of 50%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

BKR
Baker Hughes Company
$58.41
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$267.00

Rewards

BKR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 41.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.96 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BKR
  • Gross margin of 23.6% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 2.47 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
INTU
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BKR
INTU
Valuation
$3.15B
Free Cash Flow
$5.23B
5.44%
FCF Yield
7.16%
18.66
Trailing P/E
16.30
20.99
Forward P/E
9.77
Quality & Moat
7.59%
ROIC
28.21%
17.18%
ROE
22.50%
23.64%
Gross Margin
80.79%
2.47
PEG Ratio
0.73
Balance Sheet Safety
0.01
Net Debt / Equity
0.01
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.05
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.02
1.50%
Dividend Yield
1.71%
BKR: 0Ties: 1INTU: 11
BKRINTU

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BKR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BKR
$3.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.98B
Δ Market Cap
+$15.23B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BKR
50.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $58.41
Fair Value: $118.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTU
50.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $267.00
Fair Value: $535.61
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BKR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $58?

+9.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.6%

The market implies +9.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $267?

+4.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.8%

The market implies +4.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BKR
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BKR
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BKR
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.8%Retail & Other 0.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,629
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 92.3%Retail & Other 5.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,820
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BKR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTU
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BKR
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.88M
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$326,751
@ $64.22 · 2026-06-03
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$814,376
@ $66.42 · 2026-05-19
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.30M
@ $54.47 · 2026-03-16
MAGNO MARIA GEORGIA
Officer
$298,920
@ $59.04 · 2026-03-11
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$16.03M
@ $58.79 · 2026-03-11
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$16.66M
@ $61.13 · 2026-03-04
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$1.54M
@ $59.74 · 2026-02-10
MAGNO MARIA GEORGIA
Officer
$1.13M
@ $59.11 · 2026-02-09
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.22M
@ $59.11 · 2026-02-09
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$158,198
@ $55.94 · 2026-02-03
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$13,222
@ $47.56 · 2025-11-13
RAMASWAMY SREEGANESH
Officer
$1.25M
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$310,800
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$50,000
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$2.36M
@ $46.89 · 2025-09-10
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$22,500
@ $45.00 · 2025-07-24
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$23.39M
@ $44.42 · 2025-07-23
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$223,400
@ $40.00 · 2025-06-17
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$232,440
@ $38.74 · 2025-06-12
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$2.08M
@ $38.24 · 2025-06-09
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$138,662
@ $36.49 · 2025-05-07
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$196,699
@ $42.21 · 2025-03-07
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$358,319
@ $46.65 · 2025-02-12
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.28M
@ $43.62 · 2025-01-28
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $35.00 · 2024-08-08
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$4.41M
@ $38.55 · 2024-08-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTU
1
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.47M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$15.86M
@ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.06M
@ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$11.16M
@ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BKR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTU
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BKR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
View BKR Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BKR vs INTU

Is Baker Hughes Company or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 50.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $536 vs. price $267), compared to BKR's 43.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $103 vs. $58).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Baker Hughes Company or Intuit Inc.?

INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat), while BKR scores 67/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Baker Hughes Company in financial distress?

BKR's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 8.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Baker Hughes Company or Intuit Inc.?

Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Baker Hughes Company's 5.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Baker Hughes Company or Intuit Inc.?

INTU earns 28.2% ROIC versus BKR's 7.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Baker Hughes Company's or Intuit Inc.'s?

INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to BKR's 94/100 (Very Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.