Compare StocksBKR vs INTU

Baker Hughes Company (BKR) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU)

BKR
Baker Hughes Company
$60.71
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$455.24

Rewards

BKR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 41.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.06 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

BKR
  • Gross margin of 23.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $39.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
INTU
  • 24 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BKR
INTU
Valuation
$2.54B
Free Cash Flow
$5.30B
4.23%
FCF Yield
4.18%
23.35
Trailing P/E
29.58
20.88
Forward P/E
17.19
Quality & Moat
10.66%
ROIC
N/A
13.61%
ROE
N/A
23.68%
Gross Margin
80.90%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.35
Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
No debt
0.64
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.00
1.52%
Dividend Yield
1.02%
BKR: 2Ties: 1INTU: 4
BKRINTU

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BKR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BKR
$3.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.98B
Δ Market Cap
+$15.23B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BKR
18.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 18.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $60.71
Fair Value: $74.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTU
5.8% Overvalued
Price is 5.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $455.24
Fair Value: $430.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BKR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $61?

+10.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.7%

The market implies +10.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +10.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $455?

+14.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.1%

The market implies +14.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +10.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BKR
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BKR
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BKR
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 102.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,451
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 90.6%Retail & Other 7.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,066
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BKR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTU
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BKR
7
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $69.11M
MAGNO MARIA GEORGIA
Officer
$298,920
@ $59.04 · 2026-03-11
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$16.03M
@ $58.79 · 2026-03-11
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$16.66M
@ $61.13 · 2026-03-04
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$1.54M
@ $59.74 · 2026-02-10
MAGNO MARIA GEORGIA
Officer
$1.13M
@ $59.11 · 2026-02-09
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.22M
@ $59.11 · 2026-02-09
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$158,198
@ $55.94 · 2026-02-03
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$13,222
@ $47.56 · 2025-11-13
RAMASWAMY SREEGANESH
Officer
$1.25M
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$310,800
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$50,000
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$2.36M
@ $46.89 · 2025-09-10
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$22,500
@ $45.00 · 2025-07-24
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$23.39M
@ $44.42 · 2025-07-23
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$223,400
@ $40.00 · 2025-06-17
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$232,440
@ $38.74 · 2025-06-12
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$2.08M
@ $38.24 · 2025-06-09
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$138,662
@ $36.49 · 2025-05-07
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$196,699
@ $42.21 · 2025-03-07
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$358,319
@ $46.65 · 2025-02-12
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.28M
@ $43.62 · 2025-01-28
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $35.00 · 2024-08-08
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$4.41M
@ $38.55 · 2024-08-01
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$1.79M
@ $32.00 · 2024-05-24
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$169,400
@ $33.88 · 2024-04-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTU
2
Sells (3M)
24
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $121.78M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$15.86M
@ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.06M
@ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$11.16M
@ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$6.21M
@ $646.47 · 2024-12-05
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$2.36M
@ $646.83 · 2024-12-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.47M
@ $617.42 · 2024-10-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$466,015
@ $601.31 · 2024-10-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BKR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTU
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BKR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
View BKR Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis
Baker Hughes Company (BKR) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io