Compare StocksBKR vs CRM

Baker Hughes Company (BKR) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, BKR is undervalued at $60, with a DCF intrinsic value of $102 and a margin of safety of 41%. CRM is undervalued at $184, with an intrinsic value of $222981480055 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

BKR
Baker Hughes Company
$60.49
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$184.02

Rewards

BKR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 41.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $6.96 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.
CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BKR
  • Gross margin of 23.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 7.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 2.08 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
CRM
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.81 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BKR
CRM
Valuation
$4.42B
Free Cash Flow
$16.55B
7.35%
FCF Yield
N/A
19.45
Trailing P/E
21.32
19.00
Forward P/E
11.86
Quality & Moat
7.73%
ROIC
9.61%
16.46%
ROE
16.91%
23.66%
Gross Margin
77.64%
2.08
PEG Ratio
0.76
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.90
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.16
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.38
1.52%
Dividend Yield
0.96%
BKR: 4Ties: 2CRM: 5
BKRCRM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BKR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BKR
$3.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.98B
Δ Market Cap
+$15.23B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CRM
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-79.12
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BKR
48.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 48.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $60.49
Fair Value: $116.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CRM
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.02
Fair Value: $222981480055.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BKR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $60?

+9.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.3%

The market implies +9.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $184?

-21.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -21.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BKR
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BKR
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BKR
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.6%Retail & Other 0.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,632
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,568
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BKR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.52M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BKR
5
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $73.53M
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.96M
@ $55.05 · 2026-07-01
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$10.60M
@ $58.43 · 2026-06-22
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$11.49M
@ $63.36 · 2026-06-12
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$326,751
@ $64.22 · 2026-06-03
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$814,376
@ $66.42 · 2026-05-19
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.30M
@ $54.47 · 2026-03-16
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$16.03M
@ $58.79 · 2026-03-11
MAGNO MARIA GEORGIA
Officer
$298,920
@ $59.04 · 2026-03-11
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$16.66M
@ $61.13 · 2026-03-04
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$1.54M
@ $59.74 · 2026-02-10
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.22M
@ $59.11 · 2026-02-09
MAGNO MARIA GEORGIA
Officer
$1.13M
@ $59.11 · 2026-02-09
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$158,198
@ $55.94 · 2026-02-03
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$13,222
@ $47.56 · 2025-11-13
RAMASWAMY SREEGANESH
Officer
$1.25M
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$310,800
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$50,000
@ $50.00 · 2025-09-23
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$2.36M
@ $46.89 · 2025-09-10
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$22,500
@ $45.00 · 2025-07-24
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$23.39M
@ $44.42 · 2025-07-23
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$223,400
@ $40.00 · 2025-06-17
CHARLTON REBECCA L
Officer
$232,440
@ $38.74 · 2025-06-12
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$2.08M
@ $38.24 · 2025-06-09
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$138,662
@ $36.49 · 2025-05-07
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$196,699
@ $42.21 · 2025-03-07
APOSTOLIDES JAMES E
Officer
$358,319
@ $46.65 · 2025-02-12
BORRAS MARIA CLAUDIA
Officer
$3.28M
@ $43.62 · 2025-01-28
SIMONELLI LORENZO
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $35.00 · 2024-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BKR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CRM
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BKR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View BKR Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BKR vs CRM

Is Baker Hughes Company or Salesforce, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $222981480055 vs. price $184), compared to BKR's 40.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $102 vs. $60).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Baker Hughes Company or Salesforce, Inc.?

BKR scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. BKR scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Baker Hughes Company or Salesforce, Inc.?

CRM earns 9.6% ROIC versus BKR's 7.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Baker Hughes Company's or Salesforce, Inc.'s?

BKR's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CRM's 88/100 (Very Safe). BKR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

BKR vs CRM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io