Compare StocksBK vs GOOGL

The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)

BK
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
$133.78
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69

Rewards

BK
  • The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 15% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.84 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

BK
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $6.6M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BK
GOOGL
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
N/A
FCF Yield
1.57%
16.62
Trailing P/E
29.42
13.91
Forward P/E
27.06
Quality & Moat
7.68%
ROIC
20.98%
N/A
ROE
27.61%
0.00%
Gross Margin
60.37%
0.40
PEG Ratio
0.36
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Debt / Equity
0.20
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.19
1.58%
Dividend Yield
0.22%
BK: 3Ties: 1GOOGL: 3
BKGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BK
$4.97
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$8.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$43.10B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BK
69.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 69.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $133.78
Fair Value: $434.42
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
241.8% Overvalued
Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $385.69
Fair Value: $112.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BK

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

+23.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BK
92/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BK
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BK
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 88.3%Retail & Other 11.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,269
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,168
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BK
4
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.54M
MCCARTHY JOHN KEVIN
General Counsel
$4.09M
@ $136.50 · 2026-04-17
KURIMSKY KURTIS R
Officer
$719,523
@ $136.02 · 2026-04-17
HOBBS SHANNON MARIE
Officer
$40,705
@ $137.05 · 2026-04-17
PEREZ ALEJANDRO
Officer
$1.71M
@ $137.01 · 2026-04-17
MCCARTHY JOHN KEVIN
General Counsel
$1.97M
@ $98.45 · 2025-07-22
MCCARTHY JOHN KEVIN
General Counsel
$2.37M
@ $79.03 · 2025-04-29
KURIMSKY KURTIS R
Officer
$437,206
@ $77.51 · 2025-04-14
KEATING CATHERINE
Officer
$5.06M
@ $77.31 · 2025-04-14
MCCARTHY JOHN KEVIN
General Counsel
$1.91M
@ $76.31 · 2024-10-15
SMITS HANNEKE
Officer
$1.26M
@ $76.48 · 2024-10-15
SMITS HANNEKE
Officer
$961,620
@ $64.11 · 2024-07-18
SANTHANAKRISHNAN SENTHILKUMAR
Officer
$901,772
@ $57.65 · 2024-05-08
KURIMSKY KURTIS R
Officer
$360,043
@ $57.93 · 2024-05-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BK
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View BK Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis
BK vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io