Compare StocksBAX vs MSFT

Baxter International Inc. (BAX) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)

BAX
Baxter International Inc.
$16.62
VS
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$413.62

Rewards

BAX
    MSFT
    • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 68.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Microsoft Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    BAX
    • PEG ratio of 36.68 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.0x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 17.5% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    MSFT
    • FCF yield of 2.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BAX
    MSFT
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $71.61B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    2.33%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    24.65
    8.25
    Forward P/E
    21.43
    Quality & Moat
    3.15%
    ROIC
    21.58%
    -15.68%
    ROE
    24.58%
    34.65%
    Gross Margin
    68.31%
    36.68
    PEG Ratio
    1.05
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.60
    Debt / Equity
    0.30
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.05
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.26
    2.09%
    Dividend Yield
    0.88%
    BAX: 2Ties: 1MSFT: 6
    BAXMSFT

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BAX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    MSFT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BAX
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-474.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-15.88B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MSFT
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $196.68B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.81T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BAX
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $16.62
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MSFT
    2.9% Overvalued
    Price is 2.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $413.62
    Fair Value: $402.01
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BAX

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MSFT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $414?

    +13.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.3%

    The market implies +13.5% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +18.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BAX
    42/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    MSFT
    88/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BAX
    -2.66
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MSFT
    -2.51
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BAX
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 109.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders979
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MSFT
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.9%Retail & Other 24.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders8,016
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BAX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MSFT
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.99M
    STANTON JOHN W.
    Director
    $1.99M
    @ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
    SMITH BRADFORD LEE
    President
    $1.45M
    @ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BAX
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MSFT
    1
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $172.43M
    HOGAN KATHLEEN T
    Officer
    $5.05M
    @ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
    NUMOTO TAKESHI
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
    ALTHOFF JUDSON
    Officer
    $6.27M
    @ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
    SMITH BRADFORD LEE
    President
    $19.97M
    @ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
    NADELLA SATYA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $75.32M
    @ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
    NUMOTO TAKESHI
    Officer
    $2.56M
    @ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
    NUMOTO TAKESHI
    Officer
    $1.39M
    @ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
    NUMOTO TAKESHI
    Officer
    $460,008
    @ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
    HOGAN KATHLEEN T
    Officer
    $9.76M
    @ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
    ALTHOFF JUDSON
    Officer
    $7.33M
    @ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
    COLEMAN AMY
    Officer
    $5.99M
    @ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
    SMITH BRADFORD LEE
    President
    $1.68M
    @ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
    SMITH BRADFORD LEE
    President
    $35.30M
    @ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
    NUMOTO TAKESHI
    Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
    NUMOTO TAKESHI
    Officer
    $874,634
    @ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
    NUMOTO TAKESHI
    Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
    ALTHOFF JUDSON
    Officer
    $10.43M
    @ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
    NUMOTO TAKESHI
    Officer
    $414,720
    @ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
    YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
    Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
    HOGAN KATHLEEN T
    Officer
    $7.16M
    @ $411.86 · 2024-09-10
    NUMOTO TAKESHI
    Officer
    $1.03M
    @ $411.04 · 2024-09-10
    SMITH BRADFORD LEE
    President
    $16.10M
    @ $402.59 · 2024-09-09
    HOOD AMY E
    Chief Financial Officer
    $15.60M
    @ $410.55 · 2024-09-05
    NADELLA SATYA
    Chief Executive Officer
    $32.02M
    @ $408.63 · 2024-09-04
    NUMOTO TAKESHI
    Officer
    $235,535
    @ $416.14 · 2024-06-03
    ALTHOFF JUDSON
    Officer
    $10.64M
    @ $425.68 · 2024-05-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BAX
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(26/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MSFT
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BAX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
    MSFT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    View BAX Full AnalysisView MSFT Full Analysis
    BAX vs MSFT: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io