Compare StocksBAC vs WMB

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. WMB is overvalued at $73, with an intrinsic value of $19 and a margin of safety of -292%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
$73.12

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
WMB
  • Gross margin of 63.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.83 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
WMB
  • Trailing P/E of 32.1x is 41% above the historical average of 22.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.27 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (1.94x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
WMB
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$-190.25M
N/A
FCF Yield
-0.21%
13.95
Trailing P/E
32.07
11.13
Forward P/E
28.48
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
7.07%
10.64%
ROE
19.66%
0.00%
Gross Margin
63.51%
1.00
PEG Ratio
2.27
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
1.94
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.30
1.99%
Dividend Yield
2.87%
BAC: 3Ties: 1WMB: 4
BACWMB

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

WMB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
WMB
$30.77
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$33.38B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
WMB
230.5% Overvalued
Price is 230.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $73.12
Fair Value: $22.12
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

WMB

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
WMB
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
WMB
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
WMB
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 89.1%Retail & Other 10.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,324
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
WMB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
WMB
6
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.20M
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$142,600
@ $71.30 · 2026-06-01
JASEK GLEN G
Officer
$195,383
@ $78.15 · 2026-05-15
LARSEN LARRY C
Chief Operating Officer
$917,820
@ $76.48 · 2026-05-14
PORTER JOHN DEAN
Chief Financial Officer
$3.77M
@ $75.37 · 2026-05-06
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$152,700
@ $76.35 · 2026-05-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$143,500
@ $71.75 · 2026-04-01
FAZEL PAYVAND
Officer
$211,989
@ $73.15 · 2026-03-13
RINKE TODD J
Officer
$547,808
@ $74.39 · 2026-03-11
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$150,480
@ $75.24 · 2026-03-02
HAUSMAN MARY A.
Officer
$757,115
@ $74.91 · 2026-02-26
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$1.97M
@ $72.92 · 2026-02-24
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$132,780
@ $66.39 · 2026-02-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$120,220
@ $60.11 · 2026-01-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$123,800
@ $61.90 · 2025-12-09
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$242,120
@ $60.53 · 2025-11-12
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$115,240
@ $57.62 · 2025-09-04
LARSEN LARRY C
Chief Operating Officer
$263,115
@ $58.47 · 2025-08-11
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$119,360
@ $59.68 · 2025-08-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$125,400
@ $62.70 · 2025-07-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$122,420
@ $61.21 · 2025-06-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$116,420
@ $58.21 · 2025-05-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$119,060
@ $59.53 · 2025-04-01
LARSEN LARRY C
Officer
$455,520
@ $56.94 · 2025-03-12
DUNN MICHEAL G
Chief Operating Officer
$5.13M
@ $53.04 · 2025-03-07
HAUSMAN MARY A.
Officer
$511,520
@ $57.50 · 2025-03-04
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$116,980
@ $58.49 · 2025-03-03
TEPLY CHAD A
Officer
$1.47M
@ $56.46 · 2025-02-27
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$109,840
@ $54.92 · 2025-02-03
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$109,000
@ $54.50 · 2025-01-02
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$117,200
@ $58.60 · 2024-12-02
HAUSMAN MARY A.
Officer
$447,650
@ $56.30 · 2024-11-08
LARSEN LARRY C
Officer
$377,512
@ $56.48 · 2024-11-08
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$105,420
@ $52.71 · 2024-11-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$90,580
@ $45.29 · 2024-10-01
WILSON TERRANCE LANE
General Counsel
$89,580
@ $44.79 · 2024-09-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
WMB
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
WMB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View BAC Full AnalysisView WMB Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs WMB

Is Bank of America Corporation or The Williams Companies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to WMB's -291.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $19 vs. $73).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or The Williams Companies, Inc.?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while WMB scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. WMB scores 1.1 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or The Williams Companies, Inc.?

WMB earns 7.1% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or The Williams Companies, Inc.'s?

BAC's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to WMB's 34/100 (Unsafe). BAC has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.