Compare StocksBAC vs WDC

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Western Digital Corporation (WDC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, BAC is undervalued at $56, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 58%. WDC is overvalued at $746, with an intrinsic value of $423 and a margin of safety of -76%. Of the two, BAC has the wider margin of safety.

BAC
Bank of America Corporation
$56.20
VS
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
$746.23

Rewards

BAC
  • Bank of America Corporation scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
WDC
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • PEG ratio of 0.66 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 5.53 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

BAC
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
WDC
  • Share count has increased by 10% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 2 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 0.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
BAC
WDC
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$2.08B
N/A
FCF Yield
0.81%
13.95
Trailing P/E
44.63
11.13
Forward P/E
41.33
Quality & Moat
3.89%
ROIC
30.19%
10.64%
ROE
85.92%
0.00%
Gross Margin
45.43%
1.00
PEG Ratio
0.66
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
N/A
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.39
1.99%
Dividend Yield
0.08%
BAC: 3Ties: 1WDC: 4
BACWDC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
BAC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

WDC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
BAC
$2.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$55.63B
Δ Market Cap
+$131.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
WDC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-665.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$52.27B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
BAC
57.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 57.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $56.20
Fair Value: $133.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
WDC
76.4% Overvalued
Price is 76.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $746.23
Fair Value: $423.07
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
BAC

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

WDC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $746?

+34.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +32.9%

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
BAC
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
WDC
30/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
BAC
-2.31
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
WDC

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
BAC
Insiders 7.3%Institutions 70.6%Retail & Other 22.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,373
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
WDC
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 101.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,967
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
WDC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
BAC
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $20.17M
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$4.41M
@ $46.94 · 2026-03-12
BRONSTEIN SHERI B
Officer
$2.99M
@ $49.91 · 2026-03-05
SCRIVENER THOMAS M
Officer
$2.49M
@ $49.82 · 2026-03-05
ATHANASIA DEAN C
President
$6.86M
@ $50.21 · 2026-03-03
BORTHWICK ALASTAIR M.
Chief Financial Officer
$3.42M
@ $50.24 · 2026-02-27
MENSAH BERNARD AMPONSAH
Officer
$3.66M
@ $39.80 · 2024-08-27
HANS LINDSAY D
Officer
$402,410
@ $36.91 · 2024-08-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
WDC
11
Sells (3M)
36
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $53.48M
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$1.68M
@ $511.16 · 2026-06-09
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$385,924
@ $536.01 · 2026-06-09
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$235,699
@ $545.60 · 2026-06-05
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$1.38M
@ $556.24 · 2026-06-01
KIDDOO BRUCE E
Director
$396,390
@ $528.52 · 2026-05-28
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$265,973
@ $509.53 · 2026-05-27
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$48,640
@ $458.87 · 2026-05-21
DAVIS BRIAN SCOTT
Officer
$5.01M
@ $500.69 · 2026-05-11
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$2.07M
@ $443.19 · 2026-05-04
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$8.24M
@ $411.84 · 2026-05-01
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$136,884
@ $377.09 · 2026-04-21
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$2.17M
@ $255.32 · 2026-03-06
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$2.74M
@ $270.31 · 2026-03-04
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$2.50M
@ $268.27 · 2026-03-04
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$1.63M
@ $271.67 · 2026-03-02
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$61,228
@ $286.11 · 2026-02-26
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$123,662
@ $282.33 · 2026-02-24
DAVIS BRIAN SCOTT
Officer
$2.79M
@ $279.16 · 2026-02-17
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$1.83M
@ $270.49 · 2026-02-06
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$5.11M
@ $255.44 · 2026-02-02
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$102,363
@ $229.00 · 2026-01-21
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$3.72M
@ $163.16 · 2025-12-05
ALEXY KIMBERLY E.
Director
$320,165
@ $160.08 · 2025-12-04
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$449,752
@ $160.57 · 2025-12-02
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$975,696
@ $162.62 · 2025-12-01
ALEXY KIMBERLY E.
Director
$272,272
@ $154.00 · 2025-11-25
OULMAN ROXANNE M
Director
$277,956
@ $154.42 · 2025-11-25
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$1.61M
@ $161.32 · 2025-11-05
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$3.01M
@ $150.69 · 2025-11-03
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$1.02M
@ $90.29 · 2025-09-04
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$28,558
@ $80.90 · 2025-08-28
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$64,387
@ $79.10 · 2025-08-26
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$375,847
@ $75.35 · 2025-08-22
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$1.05M
@ $74.78 · 2025-08-22
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$654,334
@ $75.90 · 2025-08-19
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$722,359
@ $75.69 · 2025-08-13
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$14,212
@ $58.01 · 2025-06-17
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$94,888
@ $54.88 · 2025-06-05
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$548,354
@ $48.19 · 2025-05-13
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$19,777
@ $43.37 · 2025-03-12
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$68,616
@ $41.36 · 2025-03-07
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$22,733
@ $72.63 · 2024-11-29
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$46,053
@ $69.99 · 2024-11-26
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$24,241
@ $64.47 · 2024-11-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
BAC
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
WDC
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
BAC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
WDC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View BAC Full AnalysisView WDC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: BAC vs WDC

Is Bank of America Corporation or Western Digital Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, BAC trades at a 57.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $56), compared to WDC's -76.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $423 vs. $746).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Bank of America Corporation or Western Digital Corporation?

BAC scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while WDC scores 30/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Bank of America Corporation in financial distress?

BAC's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. WDC scores 5.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Bank of America Corporation or Western Digital Corporation?

WDC earns 30.2% ROIC versus BAC's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Bank of America Corporation's or Western Digital Corporation's?

WDC's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to BAC's 79/100 (Safe). WDC has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.